The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Jackknifing in Unbalanced Situations
Abstract
Both the standard jackknife and a weighted jackknife are investigated in the general linear model situation. Properties of bias reduction and standard error estimation are derived. and the weighted jackknife shown to be superior for unbalanced data. There is a preliminary discussion of robust regression fitting using jackknife pseudo-values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting
Silverman, B. W. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x · Cited by 1,117
How to address non-normality: a taxonomy of approaches, reviewed, and illustrated
Pek, J., Wong, O., & Wong, A. C. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02104 · Cited by 307
Cortical Gray and White Brain Tissue Volume in Adolescents and Adults with Autism
Hazlett, H. C., Poe, M. D., Gerig, G., Smith, R. G., & Piven, J. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.015 · Cited by 185
Yu, B. (2013) · Bernoulli · doi:10.3150/13-bejsp14 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinkley, D. V.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1977-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-292
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2158641414
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Jackknifing in Unbalanced Situations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1977.10489550
- The paper
- Hinkley, D. V. (1977). Jackknifing in Unbalanced Situations. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1977.10489550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
