The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum Likelihood Fitting of ARMA Models to Time Series With Missing Observations
Abstract
The method of calculating the exact likelihood function of a stationary autoregressive moving average (ARMA) time series based on Akaike's Markovian representation and using Kalman recursive estimation is reviewed. This state space approach involves matrices and vectors with dimensions equal to Max (p, q + 1) where p is the order of the autoregression and q is the order of the moving average, rather than matrices with dimensions equal to the number of observations. A key to the calculation of the exact likelihood function is the proper calculation of the initial state covariance matrix. The inclusion of observational error into the model is discussed as is the extension to missing observations. The use of a nonlinear optimization program gives the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters and allows for model identification based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). An example is presented fitting models to western United States drought data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Cited by
Statistical algorithms for models in state space using SsfPack 2.2
Koopman, S. J., Shephard, N., & Doornik, J. A. (1999) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/1368-423x.00023 · Cited by 466
Business intelligence: data mining and optimization for decision making
Vercellis, C., Ahmadi, A., & Mohebi, A. (2016) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13983826 · Cited by 398
Lost data neural semantic recovery framework for structural health monitoring based on deep learning
Jiang, K., Han, Q., & Du, X. (2022) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12850 · Cited by 77
Autoregressive spectral models of heart rate variability
Burr, R. L., & Cowan, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1016/0022-0736(92)90108-c · Cited by 55
Comparison of methods of estimating missing values in time series
Iwueze, I. S., Nwogu, E. C., Nlebedim, V. U., Nwosu, U. I., & Chinyem, U. E. (2018) · Open Journal of Statistics · doi:10.4236/ojs.2018.82025 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. H.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1980-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-395
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2060126343
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum Likelihood Fitting of ARMA Models to Time Series With Missing Observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1980.10486171
- The paper
- Jones, R. H. (1980). Maximum Likelihood Fitting of ARMA Models to Time Series With Missing Observations. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1980.10486171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.