The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure
Abstract
A generalized (extreme Studentized deviate) ESD many-outlier procedure is given for detecting from 1 to k outliers in a data set. This procedure has an advantage over the original ESD many-outlier procedure (Rosner 1975) in that it controls the type I error both under the hypothesis of no outliers and under the alternative hypotheses of 1, 2, …. k-l outliers. A method is given for approximating percentiles for this procedure based on the t distribution. This method is shown to be adequately accurate using Monte Carlo simulation, for detecting up to 10 outliers in samples as small as 25. Tables are given for implementing this method for n = 25(1)50(10)100(50)500; k = 10, α = .05, .Ol, .005.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Sample criteria for testing outlying observations
Grubbs, F. E. (1950) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729885 · Cited by 1,631
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data
Yoshihara, K., Shahmoradgoli, M., Martínez, E., Vegesna, R., Kim, H., Torres-Garcia, W., Treviño, V., Shen, H., Laird, P. W., Levine, D. A., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3612 · Cited by 9,778
Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling
Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551 · Cited by 1,211
The identification of multiple outliers
Davies, L., & Gather, U. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476339 · Cited by 709
Rapid DNA methylation changes after exposure to traffic particles
Baccarelli, A., Wright, R. O., Bollati, V., Tarantini, L., Litonjua, A. A., Suh, H. H., Zanobetti, A., Sparrow, D., Vokonas, P. S., & Schwartz, J. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200807-1097oc · Cited by 653
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosner, B.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-172
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W1969456163
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848
- The paper
- Rosner, B. (1983). Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
