Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Measure of Top – Down Correlation

Iman, Ronald L., Conover, W. J.·1987·Technometrics

Abstract

Many situations exist in which n objects are ranked by two or more independent sources, where interest centers primarily on agreement in the top rankings and disagreements on items at the bottom of the rankings are of little or no importance. A problem with Spearman's rho or Kendall's coefftcient of concordance in this setting is that they are equally influenced by disagreement on the assignment of rankings at all levels. In this article, a concordance measure is provided that is more sensitive to agreement on the top rankings. The statistics used in this setting are functions of the ordinary correlation coeRicient computed on Savage (1956) scores. The asymptotic distributions of these statistics are presented, and a summary of the quantiles of the exact distribution for the two sample case are provided for n = 3(1)14. The statistic for the two-sample case is shown to provide a locally most powerful rank test for a model given by Hájek and Šidák (1967).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00401706.1987.10488244

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Iman, R. L., & Conover, W. J.
Venue
Technometrics
Published
1987-08
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
351-357
ISSN
  • 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2723
OpenAlex
W1972827298
Cited by
166
References
0
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Measure of Top – Down Correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488244
The paper
Iman, R. L., & Conover, W. J. (1987). A Measure of Top – Down Correlation. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1987.10488244

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.