Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Graphical Display of Estimates Having Differing Standard Errors

Galbraith, R. F.·1988·Technometrics

Abstract

A graphical method is proposed to display a number of point estimates while allowing for their differing standard errors. More generally, it can be viewed as a representation of interval estimates by points on a bivariate plot. The method exploits a familiar connection between standardized estimates and regression through the origin and has several advantages over some alternative plots used in the literature. It is particularly useful when there may be a mixture of parameters, as illustrated by the problem of “mixed ages” in fission track dating.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00401706.1988.10488400

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Galbraith, R. F.
Venue
Technometrics
Published
1988-08
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
271-281
ISSN
  • 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2723
OpenAlex
W4232797957
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphical Display of Estimates Having Differing Standard Errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1988.10488400
The paper
Galbraith, R. F. (1988). Graphical Display of Estimates Having Differing Standard Errors. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1988.10488400

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.