The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Tools for Simulation Practitioners
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mayer, D. G., & Butler, D. G. (1993) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/0304-3800(93)90105-2 · Cited by 829
Analysis of Support Vector Regression for Approximation of Complex Engineering Analyses
Clarke, S. M., Griebsch, J. H., & Simpson, T. W. (2005) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.1897403 · Cited by 523
Optimization via simulation: A review
Fu, M. C. (1994) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/bf02136830 · Cited by 417
Chapter 18 Metamodel-Based Simulation Optimization
Barton, R. R., & Meckesheimer, M. (2006) · Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science · doi:10.1016/s0927-0507(06)13018-2 · Cited by 265
Angus, C., Thomas, C., Anderson, P., Meier, P. S., & Brennan, A. (2016) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw122 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Thode, H. C.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 464-464
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W4301163165
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Tools for Simulation Practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1988.10488459
- The paper
- Thode, H. C. (1988). Statistical Tools for Simulation Practitioners. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1988.10488459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
