The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction Error and Its Estimation for Subset-Selected Models
Abstract
Strategies are compared for development of a linear regression model and the subsequent assessment of its predictive ability. Simulations were performed as a designed experiment over a range of data structures. Approaches using a forward selection of variables resulted in slightly smaller prediction errors and less biased estimators of predictive accuracy than all possible subsets selection but often did not improve on the full model. Random and balanced data splitting resulted in increased prediction errors and estimators with large mean squared error. To maximize predictive accuracy while retaining a reliable estimate of that accuracy, it is recommended that the entire sample usually he used for model development and assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of Stopping Rules in Forward “Stepwise” Regression
Bendel, R. B., & Afifi, A. A. (1977) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1977.10479905 · Cited by 885
Cited by
Babyak, M. A. (2004) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9 · Cited by 2,061
Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference
Chatfield, C. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2983440 · Cited by 1,103
Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling.
Chowdhury, M. Z. I., & Turin, T. C. (2020) · Family Medicine and Community Health · doi:10.1136/fmch-2019-000262 · Cited by 1,011
Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49547 · Cited by 710
Multivariable Modeling Strategies
Harrell, F. E. (2015) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7_4 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Roecker, E. B.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-468
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2052861226
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction Error and Its Estimation for Subset-Selected Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484873
- The paper
- Roecker, E. B. (1991). Prediction Error and Its Estimation for Subset-Selected Models. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.