The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Inverse Gaussian Process as a Degradation Model
Abstract
This article systematically investigates the inverse Gaussian (IG) process as an effective degradation model. The IG process is shown to be a limiting compound Poisson process, which gives it a meaningful physical interpretation for modeling degradation of products deteriorating in random environments. Treated as the first passage process of a Wiener process, the IG process is flexible in incorporating random effects and explanatory variables that account for heterogeneities commonly observed in degradation problems. This flexibility makes the class of IG process models much more attractive compared with the Gamma process, which has been thoroughly investigated in the literature of degradation modeling. The article also discusses statistical inference for three random effects models and model selection. It concludes with a real world example to demonstrate the applicability of the IG process in degradation analysis. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
Garreau, G. A., & Rudin, W. (1987) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348852 · Cited by 10,622
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
Rosén, B. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess2351.pub2 · Cited by 3,595
Statistical Methods for Reliability Data
Nelson, W. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1998.10485526 · Cited by 2,504
A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance
van Noortwijk, J. M. (2009) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.019 · Cited by 1,359
Covariates and Random Effects in a Gamma Process Model with Application to Degradation and Failure
Lawless, J., & Crowder, M. (2004) · Lifetime Data Analysis · doi:10.1023/b:lida.0000036389.14073.dd · Cited by 583
The Inverse Gaussian Distribution: Theory, Methodology, and Applications.
Ahsanullah, M., Chhikara, R. S., & Folks, J. L. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290048 · Cited by 582
Survival in Dynamic Environments
Singpurwalla, N. D. (1995) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177010132 · Cited by 488
An Inverse Gaussian Process Model for Degradation Data
Wang, X., & Xu, D. (2010) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2009.08197 · Cited by 395
Cited by
Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016 · Cited by 2,634
Specification analysis of the deteriorating sensor for required lifetime prognostic performance
Zhang, J.-X., Si, X.-S., Du, D.-B., & Hu, C.-H. (2018) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2018.04.004 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, Z.-S., & Chen, N.
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 302-311
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2112935810
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 57.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Inverse Gaussian Process as a Degradation Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00401706.2013.830074
- The paper
- Ye, Z.-S., & Chen, N. (2014). The Inverse Gaussian Process as a Degradation Model. Technometrics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2013.830074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.