Cited by 12Optimal Experimental Design MethodsSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Split-Plot and Multi-Stratum Designs for Statistical Inference

Open access
Trinca, Luzia A., Gilmour, Steven G.·2017·Technometrics

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that many industrial and engineering experiments use split-plot or other multi-stratum structures. Much recent work has concentrated on finding optimum, or near-optimum, designs for estimating the fixed effects parameters in multi-stratum designs. However, often inference, such as hypothesis testing or interval estimation, will also be required and for inference to be unbiased in the presence of model uncertainty requires pure error estimates of the variance components. Most optimal designs provide few, if any, pure error degrees of freedom. Gilmour and Trinca (2012 Gilmour, S. G., and Trinca, L. A. (2012), “Optimum Design of Experiments for Statistical Inference” (with discussion), Applied Statistics, 61, 345–401.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) introduced design optimality criteria for inference in the context of completely randomized and block designs. Here these criteria are used stratum-by-stratum to obtain multi-stratum designs. It is shown that these designs have better properties for performing inference than standard optimum designs. Compound criteria, which combine the inference criteria with traditional point estimation criteria, are also used and the designs obtained are shown to compromise between point estimation and inference. Designs are obtained for two real split-plot experiments and an illustrative split–split-plot structure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00401706.2017.1316315

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The new designs aim to be optimal for all parameters, whereas Cao et al. (2017) and Trinca and Gilmour (2017) aim to be optimal only for fixed effects and only stratum by stratum.

    “Our designs aim to be optimal for all parameters, whereas theirs aim to be optimal only for xed eects and only stratum by stratum.”
  • The new method differs from Cao et al. (2017) and Trinca and Gilmour (2017) by adjusting the ordinary D-optimality criterion to ensure that the variance components are well estimated.

    “Our new method diers from those of Cao et al. (2017) and Trinca and Gilmour (2017), who build on the ideas in Gilmour and Trinca (2012) for completely randomized designs, in the sense that we adjust the ordinary D-optimality criterion to ensure that the variance components are well estimated.”
  • To obtain high-quality pure-error estimates of both variance components in a split-plot model, it is advisable to replicate primarily between whole plots rather than within whole plots.

    “This implies that, to obtain high-quality pure-error estimates of both variance components in a splitplot model, it is advisable to replicate primarily between whole plots rather than within whole plots.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trinca, L. A., & Gilmour, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
Technometrics
Published
2017-07-18
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
446-457
ISSN
  • 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2723
OpenAlex
W2604112075
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Technometrics (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2014/)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
split-plot design, split-split plot design, hypothesis testing, interval estimation, fixed effects estimation, model uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review