Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Challenges for Urban Governance

Kearns, Ade, Paddison, Ronan·2000·Urban Studies

Abstract

Why do we talk about ‘urban governance’ these days, much more than we discuss urban management? In his account of the cultural development of the English language, Ray-mondWilliams describes how the word ‘man-agement ’ was extended in the 16th century from its original Italian meaning of ‘to handle and train men ’ (or in its rst guise, horses) to ‘a general sense of taking control, taking charge, directing ’ (Williams, 1983, p. 190). It is this sense of the term management that has been lost in the urban context. In their institu-tionalist review of the contemporary urban challenge, Healey et al. state that urban management cannot be understood

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00420980050011118

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Kearns, A., & Paddison, R.
Venue
Urban Studies
Published
2000-05
Volume
37
Issue
5-6
Pages
845-850
ISSN
  • 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-063X
OpenAlex
W1979163120
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
41.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Challenges for Urban Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00420980050011118
The paper
Kearns, A., & Paddison, R. (2000). New Challenges for Urban Governance. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050011118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.