Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A ninth-century AD Arab or Indian shipwreck in Indonesia: First evidence for direct trade with China

Flecker, Michael·2001·World Archaeology

Abstract

A well-preserved ninth-century AD shipwreck was excavated in 1998-9 off the Indonesian island of Belitung between Sumatra and Borneo. The principal features of the wreck include planks joined by stitching with wadding inside and outside the hull, a sharp bow with little rake, stitched-in frames, through-beams stitched to the hull, removable ceiling timbers, a keelson and stringers, and a composite iron and wood anchor. Ethnographic and iconographic evidence suggests that these are the features of ancient Indian and Arab vessels, an origin which is strongly supported by the timber species identified in the wreck.The cargo consisted almost entirely of Chinese ceramics, mostly from the Changsha kilns. This is the first clear archaeological evidence to support historical records which imply that there was direct trade between the western Indian Ocean and China during the later part of the first millennium AD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438240120048662

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bronson B., 1996, Ancient Trades and Cultural Contacts in Southeast Asia, 41
  2. Burkill I. H., 1935, A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula. Vol. 2, 2
  3. Carswell J., 1999, Oriental Art Magazine, 45, 2
  4. Deloche J., 1996, Tradition and Archaeology, 199
  5. Gamble J. S., 1922, A Manual of Indian Timbers. London: Sampson
  6. Gibson-Hill C. A., 1952, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 25, 111
  7. Griffith T., 1997, Marco Polo: The Travels
  8. Guy J. S., 1990, Oriental Trade Ceramics in Southeast Asia: Ninth to Sixteenth Centuries
  9. Society. Hakluyt, The Suma Oriental of Tome Pires, 1512-1515, 1
  10. Hirth F., 1967, Chau Ju-kua
  11. Hourani G. F., 1995, Arab Seafaring in the Indian Ocean in Ancient and Early Medieval Times
  12. Huntington G. W. B., 1980, The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea
  13. Lam S. Y., 1990, Tang Ceramics: Changsha Kilns
  14. Manguin P.-Y., 1996, Tradition and Archaeology, 181
  15. Mathew K. S., 1997, Ship-building and Navigation in the Indian Ocean Region, AD 1400-1800
  16. Finger R., 1994, New Light on Chinese Yue and Longquan Wares
  17. Ray H. P., 1994, The Winds of Change: Buddhism and the Maritime Links of Early Southeast Asia
  18. Ray H. P., 1996, Tradition and Archaeology: Early Maritime Contacts in the Indian Ocean
  19. Remmelts Z., 1978, Chinesische Kaschmunzen
  20. Rougeulle A., 1996, Tradition and Archaeology, 159
  21. Subbarayalu Y., 1996, Tradition and Archaeology, 109
  22. Tibbetts G. R., 1981, Arab Navigation in the Indian Ocean before the Coming of the Portuguese
  23. Timber Research and Development Association(TRADA), 1979, Timbers of the World
  24. Vosmer T., 1997, International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 26, 217, 10.1111/j.1095-9270.1997.tb01333.x · DOI
  25. Gungwu. Wang, 1998, The Nanhai Trade: The Early History of Chinese Trade in the South China Sea
  26. Wheatley P., 1961, The Golden Khersonese
  27. Wolters O. W., 1974, Early Indonesian Commerce: A Study of the Origins of Srivijaya

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Flecker, M.
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
2001-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
335-354
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
61
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review