Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community boundary, secularized religion and imagined past in Bangladesh: Archaeology and historiography of unequal encounter

Sen, Swadhin·2002·World Archaeology
DOI 10.1080/0043824022000007143
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The past, as constructed by the modern power of colonialism and nationalism, has essentialized the ideals of nation-state through the process of homogenizing the polysemous identities of non-Western societies and religions. The power of this imagined past is particularly manifested in the institutionalization of the disciplines of archaeology and history, and has acted to fix communitarian boundaries within the conditions and structures of inequality. The analysis of the part played by archaeological narratives in this process of fixation within the domain of nation-state has not even been initiated in the context of Bangladesh. This paper examines the conditions and processes in and by which the secularized notion of religion and representations of the past have been persuaded and coerced to invoke the 'pure' ideals of nation while simultaneously subordinating other notions of collective identity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0043824022000007143

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bhadra G., 1983, Mughal Yuge Krishi-Arthoniti O Krishak Bidroha
  2. Bhadra G., 1994, Iman O Nishan: Unish Shatake Banglar Krishak Chaitonyer ek adhay
  3. Majumder R. C., 1966, Hindu Musulman Sanskriter Samanway. Kamala Baktritamala
  4. Sahnawaz A. K. M., 1999, Mudray O Shilalipite Madhyayuger Banglar Sam O Sanskrite
  5. Ahmed N., 1979, Bangladesh Archaeology (No. 1)
  6. Alam M. S., 1999, Excavation at Ananda Vihara, Mainamati, Camilla 1979-82
  7. Asad T., 1996, SEHR, 5, 1
  8. Bhadra G., 1989, Subaltern Studies VI: Writings on South Asian History and Society, 54
  9. Chatterjee P., 1983, Subaltern Studies II: Writings on South Asian History and Society, 1
  10. Chatterjee P., 1999, Partha Chatterjee Omnibus
  11. Guha R., 1982, Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society
  12. Guha R., 1982, Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society
  13. Guha R., 1983, Subaltern Studies II: Writings on South Asian History and Society
  14. Guha R., 1983, Subaltern Studies II: Writings on South Asian History and Society
  15. Hardiman D., 1984, Peasant Nationalists of Gujrat
  16. Hasan P., 1989, Muqamas, 6, 58
  17. Hasan S. M., 1980, Muslim Monuments of Bangladesh, 2nd edn
  18. Jacob M. C., 1992, Social Research, 59, 59
  19. Kaviraj S., 1992, Subaltern Studies VII: Writings on South Asian History and Society, 1
  20. Metcalf T. R., 1997, Paradigms of Indian Architecture: Space and Time in Representation and Design
  21. Miah M. A. H., 2001, A Preliminary Report on Excavations at Halud Vihara, Naogaon
  22. Pandey G., 1982, Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History and Society, 143
  23. Pandey G., 1983, Subaltern Studies II: Writings on South Asian History and Society, 60
  24. Sen A., 1987, Subaltern Studies V: Writings on South Asian History and Society, 203
  25. Sen S., 2001, Pratnatattva, 7, 1
  26. Weber M., 1947, Theory of Social and Economic Organisation

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Sen, S.
Venue
World Archaeology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-09
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
346-362
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
DOI
10.1080/0043824022000007143
Cited by
9
References
30
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.