The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
University-based archaeology teaching and learning and professionalism in Australia
Abstract
What should students learn through studying archaeology at university in Australia and what key challenges do university staff and students face? This paper presents an analysis of short written responses to these questions from over fifty delegates at a national teaching and learning workshop for archaeologists held in Sydney in September 2003. The most highly valued learning outcomes were generic. Delegates' responses placed major emphasis on students' ability to apply archaeological knowledge and skills in the cultural heritage management workplace. Most delegates were concerned about university funding cuts and government education policies and how to foster better co-operation between universities, consulting companies and government heritage agencies in teaching/training. The paper presents a critique and analysis of these and other responses in the context of the current state of Australian archaeology and attitudes towards teaching on and off campus.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Archaeologists often implicitly claim HM as a natural component of their wider discipline.
“Archaeologists often implicitly claim HM as a natural component of their wider discipline (e.g.Colley 2004; King 2002) but there has been criticism of the conflation of heritage with archaeology (Smith and Waterton, 2009; Skeates 2000: 17; Willems 2014: 107; Seif 2017: 128).”
From Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms (2018) · cites this paper as Colley 2004
Citations
Cites
Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
Biggs, J. (1996) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00138871 · Cited by 4,084
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Colley S, 2000, Antiquity, 74, 171, 10.1017/S0003598X0006631X · DOI
- Colley S 2002Uncovering Australia: Archaeology, Indigenous People and the PublicSydney and Washington, DC: Allen & Unwin and Smithsonian Institution Press
- Colley S, 2003, Australian Archaeology, 57, 90, 10.1080/03122417.2003.11681766 · DOI
- Colley S Nicholson H 2003 Who is teaching what, where and why? Preliminary survey results Presentation at National Archaeology Teaching and Learning Workshop, Australian Technology Park, Sydney, September
- Feary S, 1994, Australian Archaeology, 39, 130, 10.1080/03122417.1994.11681539 · DOI
- Frankel D, 1980, Australian Archaeology, 11, 69, 10.1080/03122417.1980.12092780 · DOI
- 10.1080/0043824022000007099 · DOI
- Head L, 1998, Australian Archaeology, 46, 1, 10.1080/03122417.1998.11681599 · DOI
- Lydon J, 2002, Tempus, 7, 129
- McBryde I, 1980, Australian Archaeology, 11, 72, 10.1080/03122417.1980.12092781 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203413937 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms
Willems, A., Thomas, S., Castillo Mena, A., Čeginskas, V., Immonen, V., Kalakoski, I., Lähdesmäki, T., Lähdesmäki, U., Gowen-Larsen, M., Marciniak, A., et al. (2018) · Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites · doi:10.1080/13505033.2018.1559423 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Colley, S.
- Venue
- World Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-202
- ISSN
- 0043-8243
- 1470-1375
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
