Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hunters at Hengistbury: Some evidence from experimental archaeology

Barton, R. N. E., Bergman, C. A.·1982·World Archaeology

Abstract

The first part of this paper describes arrow‐firing experiments using copies of English Mesolithic points slotted into arrowshafts and shot into an animal carcass. ‘Impact fractures’ on the experimental flint points are compared with breakages observed on several microliths from the Powell Mesolithic site at Hengistbury Head, in Dorset. In the second part, the authors examine artefact distribution patterns from the Mace/Campbell Upper Palaeolithic site at Hengistbury and compare them briefly with those from the Belgian site of Meer, also in sands. In addition, some recent flint‐scatter experiments in sands are described and their relevance to site formation processes discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438243.1982.9979864

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Barton , R. N. E. in press . Some conjoinable artifacts from a new Mesolithic site at Hengistbury Head, Dorset. . Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society. ,
  2. Becker , C. J. 1945 . “ En 8000‐Årig stenalderboplads i Holmegaards Mose ” . In Fra National‐Museets Arbejdsmark Copenhagen
  3. 10.3406/bspf.1980.5248 · DOI
  4. Bronsted , J. 1957 . Danmarks Oldtid. , 2nd ed. , vol. 1 , Copenhagen : Gyldendal .
  5. 10.1080/00438243.1980.9979787 · DOI
  6. Cahen , D. , Karlin , C. , Keeley , L. H. and Van Noten , F. 1980 . Méthodes d'analyse technique, spatiale et fonctionnelle d'ensembles lithiques. . Helinium. , 20 : 209 – 59 .
  7. Campbell , J. B. 1977 . The Upper Palaeolithic of Britain: a study of man in the Late Ice Age , Oxford University Press .
  8. Clark , J. G. D. 1934 . The classification of a microlithic culture: the Tardenoisian of Horsham. . Archaeological Journal. , 90 : 55 – 77 .
  9. Clark , J. G. D. 1961 . World Prehistory: an outline , Cambridge University Press .
  10. 10.2307/279040 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0033-5894(77)90071-0 · DOI
  12. Jacobi , R. M. 1978 . “ Northern England in the eighth millennium BC: an essay. ” . In The Early Postglacial Settlement of Northern Europe , Edited by: Mellars , P. London : Duckworth .
  13. 10.3406/galip.1966.1264 · DOI
  14. Leroi‐Gourhan , A. and Brézillon , M. 1972 . “ Fouillesde Pincevent: essai d'analyse ethnographique d'un habitat magdalénien ” . In Gallia‐Préhistoire, suppl. 7 , 2 vols , Paris : CNRS .
  15. 10.1017/S0079497X00016558 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/esp.3290030203 · DOI
  17. 10.1179/009346980791505392 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0305-4403(74)90024-7 · DOI
  19. Petersson , M. 1951 . Microlithen als Pfeilspitzen: Ein Fund aus dem Lilla Loshult Moor, Ksp. Loshult, SkÅne. . Meddelanden fran Lunds universitets historkiska museums. , : 123 – 37 .
  20. Rust , A. 1943 . Die alt‐ und mittelsteinzeitlichen Funde von Stellmoor , Neumünster .
  21. Van Noten , F. 1978 . Les Chasseurs de Meer , Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandenses Vol. 18 , Bruges : De Tempel .
  22. Yellen , J. E. 1977 . Archaeological Approaches to the Present: models for reconstructing the past , New York : Academic Press .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barton, R. N. E., & Bergman, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford
  • University of London
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
1982-10
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
237-248
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
122
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review