The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An experiment in archaeological site location: Modeling in the Netherlands using GIS techniques
Abstract
Regional models portraying archaeological expectation or sensitivity based on knowledge of the current archaeological situation can be of great use to archaeologists in the Netherlands. If past work can be used to guide future efforts to the most archaeologically sensitive regions, benefits in efficiency, cost‐reduction, preservation, etc. can be realized. A GIS‐based approach to archaeological modeling is described that summarizes archaeological expectation along multiple environmental dimensions. The approach is based on a mix of objective data together with archaeological experience and expertise. An application to the Regge Valley region of the Netherlands shows excellent results in terms of archaeological expectation and performance on known site samples. These results are placed within the context of the many problems and difficulties that modeling research must address in this area of Europe, and a variety of suggested improvements are offered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, various authors concluded that this condition could not be met under most circumstances (Brandt et al. 1992;Dalla Bona 1994;Deeben et al. 1997) because of biases in archaeological survey procedures and therefore a statistically”
From Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene (2012) · cites this paper as Brandt et al. 1992
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Allen K. M. S., 1990, Interpreting Space: GIS and archaeology
- Ankum L. A., 1990, De Sintering van Archeologische Vindplaatsen
- 10.1080/02693798708927799 · DOI
- Bettinger R. L., 1980, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 189, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003103-0.50010-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown P. E., 1981, Granite Reef: a study in desert archaeology, 267
- Burrough P. E., 1986, Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, 10.1080/10106048609354060 · DOI
- Jochim M. A., 1976, Hunter‐Gatherer Subsistence and Settlement: a predictive model
- 10.1146/annurev.an.06.100177.002403 · DOI
- Judge W. J., 1988, Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: theory, method, and application of archaeological predictive modeling
- 10.2307/281065 · DOI
- Kohler T. A., 1986, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 9, 397, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003109-2.50011-8 · DOI
- Kvamme K. L., 1988, Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: theory, method, and application of archaeological predictive modeling, 325
- Kvamme K. L., 1990, Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: a flexible framework, 3, 257
- Parker S. C., 1985, For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: bridging data structure, quantitative technique, and theory, 173
- Shennan S., 1988, Quantifying Archaeology
- Shermer S. J., 1985, Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 10, 215
- Thomas D. H., 1979, Archaeology
- Thompson T. L., 1991, INFORMIX‐SQL: a tutorial and reference
- Tomlin D., 1983, Digital Cartographic Modeling Techniques in Environmental Planning
- Wansleeben M., 1988, Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1988, 2, 435
- Westervelt J., 1991, GRASS: geographical analysis support system, introduction to GRASS 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene
Verhagen, P., & Whitley, T. G. (2012) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9102-7 · Cited by 190
Yaworsky, P. M., Vernon, K. B., Spangler, J. D., Brewer, S. C., & Codding, B. F. (2020) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239424 · Cited by 104
Mapping the Political Landscape: Toward a GIS Analysis of Environmental and Social Difference
Kosiba, S., & Bauer, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9126-z · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Brandt, R., Groenewoudt, B. J., & Kvamme, K. L.
- Venue
- World Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 268-282
- ISSN
- 0043-8243
- 1470-1375
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
