Dating human dispersal in Remote Oceania: A Bayesian view from Hawai‘i
Abstract
Settlement date estimates for Hawai’i and New Zealand are derived using Bayesian calibration of radiocarbon dates on paleoenvironmental and archaeological samples to demonstrate that the Bayesian framework provides the tools needed to resolve the order of settlement events in Remote Oceania, as well as the time elapsed between them. It predicts that archaeologists will successfully refine the dating of human dispersal elsewhere in Remote Oceania when they work collaboratively to build chronological models within a Bayesian framework.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New Zealand is dated through a Bayesian model of radiocarbon dates to AD 1270-1309.
“On the late end of the settlement of Polynesia, New Zealand is dated through the Bayesian model of radiocarbon dates to AD 1270-1309 [35].”
From Dispersal, Isolation, and Interaction in the Islands of Polynesia: A Critical Review of Archaeological and Genetic Evidence (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Dye, T. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dye, Thomas S.
- ORCID
- Dye, Thomas S.
- Venue
- World Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 661-676
- ISSN
- 0043-8243 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1375
- OpenAlex
- W1894837816
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- World Archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
- Keywords
- human dispersal, Remote Oceania, radiocarbon dating, Bayesian calibration, chronology, Hawaii, New Zealand, archaeological samples
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
