The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disarticulation sequences and scattering patterns in temperate southeastern Australia
Abstract
The effects of scavenging vertebrates and invertebrates on the processes of carcase disarticulation and skeletal scattering have been limited methodologically. This pilot study used controlled animal model research over three months during late autumn/early winter in temperate southeastern Australia to generate disarticulation sequences and skeletal scattering patterns. Four Sus scrofa (White hybrid) placed on the natural ground surface outdoors were subjected to two treatments, caged for two weeks and uncaged for the experimental phase, and observed as they decomposed, disarticulated and scattered. There was a similar disarticulation sequence among the four carcases, regardless of treatments. Ribs, cervical and thoracic vertebrae and the cranium disarticulated early in the sequence, while the forelimbs, hind-limbs, rump and lumbar vertebrae disarticulated later. The scattered skeletal material consisted mostly of back/chest elements. It is concluded that the differing disarticulation sequences between this study and published accounts is related to the effects of the invertebrates both on the scavenging behaviour of vertebrates and the process of disarticulation. The implications for forensic investigations involving scavenged remains include the ability to improve search and relocation methods, time-since-death estimation and a greater understanding of the processes occurring after death.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vertebrate and invertebrate activity and its potential to alter forensic contexts still seems underrepresented in forensic literature.
“vertebrate and invertebrate activity and its potential to alter forensic contexts still seems to be underrepresented in forensic literature”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Oxenham M F, 2008, Forensic approaches to death, disaster and abuse, p. 1
- Dirkmaat D C, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, p. 39
- Lyman, RL. 1994. Vertebrate taphonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Sorg M H, 2002, Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory and archaeological perspectives, p. 3
- 10.1002/oa.833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12024-007-0016-3 · DOI
- 10.1071/ZO01010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- D'Andrea A C, 1984, Arctic, 37, 276, 10.14430/arctic2201 · DOI
- Haglund W D, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, p. 367
- Haglund W D, 1989, J Forensic Sci, 38, 587, 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
- 10.2307/279115 · DOI
- Hill A, 1979, Paleobiology, 5, 261, 10.1017/S0094837300006552 · DOI
- Willey P, 1989, J Forensic Sci, 34, 894, 10.1520/JFS12718J · DOI · Paper page
- Hill A, 1984, Paleobiology, 10, 366, 10.1017/S0094837300008332 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00134.x · DOI · Paper page
- Oliver J S, 1994, Palaeobiology, 20, 229, 10.1017/S0094837300012707 · DOI
- Morton R J, 2002, Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory and archaeological perspectives, p. 151
- Cameron A C, A forensic study of disarticulation, scattering and scavenging [honours thesis]
- National Capital Development Commission, 1984, The ecological resources of the ACT
- Drennan R D, 1996, Statistics for archaeologists: a commonsense approach, 10.1007/978-1-4899-0165-1 · DOI
- Toots H, 1965, University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology, 4, 37
- 10.1139/z04-022 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12378.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Cameron, A. C., & Oxenham, M.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cameron, Alyce Clare
- ORCID
- Oxenham, Marc
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-211
- ISSN
- 0045-0618 (ISSN-L)
- 1834-562X
- OpenAlex
- W1972436653
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- Sus scrofa, wild boar, postmortem decomposition, forensic taphonomy, postmortem interval estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review