Reconsidering Personal Epistemology as Metacognition: A Multifaceted Approach to the Analysis of Epistemic Thinking
Abstract
One of the central unresolved conceptual issues that concerns researchers of personal epistemology is the characterization of the intersection between personal epistemology and metacognition. The contested and diverse nature of both constructs makes untangling their connections a complex yet vital task. The purpose of this article is to advance the discussion regarding this intersection by offering a theoretical approach that may serve as a basis for analyzing epistemic thinking and aligning it with current views of metacognition. Based on a synthesis of theoretical and empirical studies, we argue that epistemic thinking is a multifaceted construct with both cognitive and metacognitive aspects. Furthermore, we propose that epistemic metacognition includes several aspects such as metacognitive skills; metacognitive knowledge about persons, strategies and tasks; and metacognitive experiences. The theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications of this approach are explored.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 175 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-35
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2011343973
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 175
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 24.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- personal epistemology, metacognition, epistemic thinking, metacognitive skills, metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive experience, epistemic strategies, epistemological beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review