Cited by 59Disaster Management and ResilienceEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesHistorical Education Studies Worldwide

Continuity and change in disaster education in Japan

Open access
Kitagawa, Kaori·2015·History of Education

Abstract

This article aims to describe post-war continuity and change in disaster education in Japan. Preparedness for natural disasters has been a continuous agenda in Japan for geographical and meteorological reasons, and disaster education has been practised in both formal and informal settings. Post-war disaster management and education have taken a follow-up approach, which means that clusters of measures have been developed after critical national-scale disasters have occurred. Following this clustering, with a minor amendment, the article discusses continuity and change in disaster education, looking at the different versions of the national curriculum (the Course of Study) at the compulsory school level. It is argued that disaster education has always been delivered at school in post-war Japan – this is the continuity – however, its treatment in the curriculum has changed over the years, from the scientific knowledge model, to the civic participation model, to the multi-hazard model, to the everyday life model within broader economic, political and social contexts – this is the change. Through this historical description, the article sheds light on the complexity of the field ‘disaster education’, particularly its two-dimensional aspect, namely, ‘the science of disasters’ on the one hand, and ‘life skills for disasters’ on the other. Currently, these two dimensions are addressed within the policy framework of School Safety. It is argued, however, that this complexity has been…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0046760x.2014.979255

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Kitagawa, K.
Affiliations
University of East London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kitagawa, Kaori
Venue
History of Education
Published
2014-12-15
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
371-390
ISSN
  • 0046-760X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5130
OpenAlex
W2054865112
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • History of Education (publishedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Councils UK
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K000233/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Education, Safety, and Science Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Historical Education Studies Worldwide
Keywords
disaster education, Japan, compulsory school curriculum, course program, natural disaster preparedness, citizen participation, multi-hazard approach, school safety policy, Great East Japan Earthquake, curriculum change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review