The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cultural research management in Africa: challenges, dangers and opportunities
Abstract
Much of Africa's archaeological heritage is under threat, partly as a result of modernisation and development. The current boom in infrastructural projects is causing an acceleration of irreversible destruction. This paper focuses on appropriate measures and action to minimise damage or loss through archaeological impact assessments (AIAs), subcomponents of environmental impact assessments (EIAs). It is argued that both AIAs and EIAs must be better integrated into national heritage legislations and operational policy guidelines by international donor agencies. However, to achieve this will take concerted efforts by the archaeological community to convince government officials, as well as multilateral development banks, of the socioeconomic benefits of cultural resources. Nevertheless, the process of commercialising the archaeological discipline may not come without challenges and risks. Issues of oversight, quality of work, and ethics, particularly regarding impacted communities, will have to be tackled to guarantee best practice and proper integration into the academic establishment. Closer collaboration with communities will be fundamental to raising archaeology's public profile in Africa, turning it into a more relevant discipline for sustainable development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Increasingly, African heritage sites are threatened with various forms of economic development.2”
From Heritage conservation in Africa: The good, the bad, and the challenges (2013) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“In the entire sub-Saharan region, only Botswana, Namibia and South Africa have legislation which makes it mandatory for impact assessments.2,12”
From Heritage conservation in Africa: The good, the bad, and the challenges (2013) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Adande A.B.A., 1991, West African Journal of Archaeology, 21, 49
- Aguigah A.D., 2008, L'Archéologie Préventive en Afrique, 127
- 10.1023/A:1015473709731 · DOI
- Bernus S., 1991, Etudes Nigériennes, 51, 1
- Brandt S.A., 2000, Dams and cultural heritage management, 33
- Boachie-Ansah J., 2008, L'Archéologie Préventive en Afrique, 110
- Bocoum H., 2008, L'archéologie préventive en Afrique, 75
- Campbell I., 2000, Dams and cultural heritage management, 39
- Chen , C. , P. Chiu , R. Orr , and A. Goldstein . 2007 . An empirical analysis of Chinese construction firms entry into Africa . The CRIOCM 2007 International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate . www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/communications/pdf/2007/190907/goldsteinS4.pdf (accessed 2 February 2009) .
- de Maret P., 2008, L'Archéologie Préventive en Afrique, 142
- Deacon J., 1996, Aspects of African archaeology, 839
- Dietler , M. 2007 . Review column: A short guide to American archaeology . European Journal of Archaeology . http://eja.e-a-a.org/2007/09/10/review-column-a-short-guide-to-american-archaeology/ (accessed 2 February 2009) .
- Folorunso C.A., 2008, L'Archéologie préventive en Afrique, 135
- Gallin A., 2008, Cahiers de l'AARS, 12, 70
- Grébenart D., 1985, Etudes Nigériennes, 49, 1
- 10.1080/0043824042000261031 · DOI
- Hassan F., 2000, Dams and cultural heritage management, 30
- Inskeep R., 2000, Dams and cultural heritage management, 27
- 10.1023/B:AARR.0000030786.24067.19 · DOI
- King T.F., 2002, Thinking about cultural resource management: Essays from the edge
- Kusimba C.M., 1996, Plundering Africa's past, 201
- Lavachery P., 2005, Journal of African Archaeology, 3, 175, 10.3213/1612-1651-10049 · DOI
- MacEachern S., 2001, Antiquity, 75, 866, 10.1017/S0003598X00089444 · DOI
- Millet D., 2002, 50 Questions, 50 Réponses sur la Dette, le FMI et la Banque Mondiale
- Naffé B.O.M., 2008, L'archéologie préventive en Afrique
- Nao O., 2008, L'archéologie préventive en Afrique, 100
- Näser C., Ethnographic research in the 4th Nile cataract area
- Ndoro W., 2001, The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter, 16, 20
- Paris F., 1984, Etudes Nigériennes, 50, 1
- Posnansky M., 2000, Dams and cultural heritage management, 36
- Raab M.L., 1999, Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 35, 83
- Sanogo K., 2008, L'archéologie préventive en Afrique, 97
- Schlanger N., 2008, L'archéologie préventive en Afrique, 31
- Segobye A.K., 2008, L'archéologie préventive en Afrique, 164
- Shaw T., 1970, West African Archaeology Newsletter, 12, 3
- Sidibe , S. 1986 . Pour l'urgence d'une archéologie de sauvetage . In Archéologie Africaine et Sciences de la Nature Appliquées à l'Archéologie , 433 – 6 . 1er Symposium International Bordeaux 1983. Paris: ACCT/CNRS/CRIAA .
- Thiaw I., 2003, Journal of African Archaeology, 1, 215, 10.3213/1612-1651-100010 · DOI
- Van Waarden C., 1996, Aspects of African archaeology, 829
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heritage conservation in Africa: The good, the bad, and the challenges
Chirikure, S. (2013) · South African Journal of Science · doi:10.1590/sajs.2013/a003 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Arazi, N.
- Venue
- Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-106
- ISSN
- 0067-270X
- 1945-5534
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review