The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Value-Expressive versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal
Abstract
Value-expressive advertising appeals are effective when the product is value-expressive, while utilitarian appeals are effective when the product is utilitarian. When the product is value-expressive, audience persuasion is influenced through self-congruity. Conversely, when the product is utilitarian, audience persuasion is influenced through functional congruity. The effectiveness of the value-expressive as opposed to utilitarian appeals is argued also to be a function of such product-related factors as differentiation, life cycle, scarcity, and conspicuousness, and consumer-related factors such as involvement, prior knowledge, and self-monitoring. Future research and managerial implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ashley, C., & Tuten, T. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20761 · Cited by 1,462
Aggarwal, P., Jun, S. Y., & Huh, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367400302 · Cited by 349
Paschen, J. (2019) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-12-2018-2179 · Cited by 132
Akbari, M. (2015) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150915569936 · Cited by 105
Liu, F., Xiao, B., Lim, E. T. K., & Tan, C.-W. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-09-2016-0280 · Cited by 100
Teichert, T., Hardeck, D., Liu, Y., & Trivedi, R. (2018) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2017-054 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 23-33
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W1970200121
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
