Cited by 35LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Beyond Happiness: Minority Stress and Life Meaning Among LGB Individuals

Douglass, Richard P., Conlin, Sarah E., Duffy, Ryan D.·2020·Journal of Homosexuality

Abstract

Scholars have recently started to examine how minority stressors are associated with wellbeing outcomes among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people. Such studies have examined mainly hedonic wellbeing, and those that have investigated eudaimonic wellbeing have tended to use composite measures. The present study draws from this literature to examine how minority stressors are associated with a key indicator of eudaimonic wellbeing: life meaning. Drawing from the minority stress model, we examined these associations using structural equation modeling among 266 LGB adults. Expectations of rejection and identity concealment, but not discrimination or internalized homophobia, had significant negative associations with life meaning. Discrimination had negative indirect associations with life meaning via expectations of rejection and concealment. Our results highlight the nuanced relations that exist between minority stressors and life meaning and highlight the need to move beyond composite measures of wellbeing. Implications for clinical practice and directions for research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00918369.2019.1600900

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proximal stressors arise from a socialization process in which sexual and gender minority people learn to reject themselves (internalized stigma), develop expectations of rejection, and/or conceal their LGBT identity.

    “Proximal stressors arise from a socialization process in which sexual and gender minority people learn to reject themselves for being LGBT (internalized stigma) [12,13], develop expectations to be stigmatized due to awareness of prevailing social stigma (expectations of rejection) [14], and/or hide their LGBT identity as a way to protect themselves against distal minority stressors (identity Conce”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglass, R. P., Conlin, S. E., & Duffy, R. D.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Douglass, Richard P.
Venue
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2019-04-21
Volume
67
Issue
11
Pages
1587-1602
ISSN
  • 0091-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-3602
OpenAlex
W2939357551
Cited by
35
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Homosexuality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
minority stress, meaning of life, eudaimonic well-being, identity concealment, discrimination, internalized homophobia, hedonic well-being, minority stress model
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Adult, Bisexuality, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Stress, Psychological, Homosexuality, Female, Young Adult, Homophobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review