The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty
Abstract
Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses for systems that involve both stochastic (i.e., aleatory) and subjective (i.e., epistemic) uncertainty are discussed. In such analyses, the dependent variable is usually a complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) that arises from stochastic uncertainty; uncertainty analysis involves the determination of a distribution of CCDFs that results from subjective uncertainty, and sensitivity analysis involves the determination of the effects of subjective uncertainty in individual variables on this distribution of CCDFs. Uncertainty analysis is presented as an integration problem involving probability spaces for stochastic and subjective uncertainty. Approximation procedures for the underlying integrals are described that provide an assessment of the effects of stochastic uncertainty, an assessment of the effects of subjective uncertainty, and a basis for performing sensitivity studies. Extensive use is made of Latin hypercube sampling, importance sampling and regression-based sensitivity analysis techniques. The underlying ideas, which are initially presented in an abstract form, are central to the design and performance of real analyses. To emphasize the connection between concept and computational practice, these ideas are illustrated with an analysis involving the MACCS reactor accident consequence model a, performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, and a probabilistic risk assessment for a nuclear power station.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology
Marino, S., Hogue, I. B., Ray, C. J., & Kirschner, D. E. (2008) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.011 · Cited by 2,999
Sampling methods for solving Bayesian model updating problems: A tutorial
Lye, A., Cicirello, A., & Patelli, E. (2021) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107760 · Cited by 169
Sensitivity analysis in conjunction with evidence theory representations of epistemic uncertainty
Helton, J. C., Johnson, J. D., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sallaberry, C. J. (2006) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.055 · Cited by 112
Self-citationMokhtari, A., & Frey, H. C. (2005) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00679.x · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Helton, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 3-76
- ISSN
- 0094-9655 (ISSN-L)
- 1563-5163
- OpenAlex
- W2116413426
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00949659708811803
- The paper
- Helton, J. C. (1997). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659708811803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.