Cited by 224Environmental and sustainability educationEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability and Education

‘Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field’

Ballantyne, Roy, Fien, John, Packer, Jan·2001·The Journal of Environmental Education

Abstract

Educators have invested considerable effort in developing environmental education programs that address students' knowledge, attitudes, and action competence regarding environmental issues. The authors explore the effectiveness of such programs in terms of both student learning outcomes and the intergenerational influence that results when students discuss their learning experiences with their parents and other community members. Six environmental education programs involving 284 students in Queensland schools, from Grades 5-12, were investigated. Students and their parents were surveyed and interviewed regarding their perceptions about the program, the program's influence on their environmental learning, and the extent and nature of discussions that the program stimulated between students and their parents. The authors draw conclusions about key features that should be incorporated into environmental education programs to encourage and empower students to bring about environmental change in their homes and communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00958960109598657

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Environmental education initiatives promote intergenerational influence, as students share their learning with family and community members, thereby broadening the impact of environmental education.

    “These initiatives also promote intergenerational influence, as students share their learning with family and community members, thereby broadening the impact of environmental education (Ballantyne et al., 2001; Duvall and Zint, 2007).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J.
Venue
The Journal of Environmental Education
Published
2001-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
8-15
ISSN
  • 0095-8964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1892
OpenAlex
W2105647340
Cited by
224
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
27.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Environmental Education (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and sustainability education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Sustainability and Education
Keywords
environmental education programs, program effectiveness, intergenerational influence, student-parent communication, learning outcomes, environmental attitudes, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review