The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of Responsible Behavior in Members of Three Wisconsin Conservation Organizations
Abstract
Wisconsin members of Trout Unlimited (TU), Ducks Unlimited (DU), and the Wisconsin Trappers' Association (WTA) were surveyed to assess the most parsimonious sets of eight selected variables that best predicted responsible environmental behavior and to what extent these sets of variables differed from the most parsimonious set of predictors of responsible environmental behavior in a selected Sierra Club sample. The most parsimonious set of variables best predicting overt responsible environmental behavior of the TU sample consisted of perceived skill in using environmental action strategies (SKILL) and level of environmental sensitivity (LES, total R 1 − .1513). For the DU sample, the most parsimonious set of predictors consisted of SKILL and individual locus of control (total R2 = .2077). For the WTA sample, the most parsimonious set of predictors consisted of SKILL, LES, and group locus of control (total R 2 = .5023). The most parsimonious set of predictor variables for the selected Sierra Club sample consisted of SKILL and LES (total R 1 = .4000). We concluded that perceived skill in using environmental action strategies, level of environmental sensitivity, and locus of control appear to be important factors in the development of responsible environmental behavior in the populations sampled. It was recommended that these variables be addressed in formal and nonformal environmental education programs, where appropriate. Research recommendations called for assessment of predictors of responsible environmental behavior in other populations and an attempt to identify variables accounting for the remaining variance in the populations sampled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
Self-citation
Cited by
Place Attachment and Environmentally Responsible Behavior
Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958960109598658 · Cited by 1,113
Education for strategic environmental behavior
Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620701581539 · Cited by 1,009
Ramkissoon, H., Graham Smith, L. D., & Weiler, B. (2013) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.003 · Cited by 912
Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment
Halpenny, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.006 · Cited by 818
Significant Life Experiences Revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity
Chawla, L. (1998) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/1350462980040402 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Sivek, D. J., & Hungerford, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Environmental Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 35-40
- ISSN
- 0095-8964 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1892
- OpenAlex
- W1974829221
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Responsible Behavior in Members of Three Wisconsin Conservation Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00958964.1990.9941929
- The paper
- Sivek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1990). Predictors of Responsible Behavior in Members of Three Wisconsin Conservation Organizations. The Journal of Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.9941929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.