Cited by 49Water Treatment and DisinfectionCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH RISK ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO CHLOROFORM IN INDOOR SWIMMING POOLS

Benoît Lévesque, Pierre Ayotte, Rob·2000·Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A

Abstract

The exposure of swimmers to chloroform (CHCl3) was investigated in indoor swimming pools of the Quebec City region along with the associated carcinogenic risk. Six training sessions involving 52 competition swimmers (11 to 20 yr old) were conducted in 3 different pools, while 12 adult leisure swimmers attended 5 sessions, each held in a different pool. For each session, water and ambient air CHCl3 concentrations were measured and CHCl3 levels in alveolar air samples (CHCl3 ALV) collected from swimmers prior to entering the swimming pool premises and after 15, 35, and 60 min of swimming. Mean water concentrations varied from 18 microg/L to 80 microg/L, while those in air ranged from 78 microg/m3 to 329 microg/m3. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that CHCl3 ALV values in competition swimmers were strongly correlated to ambient air and water levels, and to a lesser degree to the intensity of training. Only ambient air concentration was positively correlated to CHCl3 ALV in the leisure group. Concentrations of CHCl3 metabolites bound to hepatic and renal macromolecules, estimated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, were 1.6 and 1.9 times higher for the competition swimmers than for the leisure swimmers, respectively. The highest hepatic concentration predicted in competition swimmers, 0.22 microg CHCl3 equivalents/kg of tissue, was at least 10,000 times lower than the smallest no observed effect level for liver tumors in animals. Data indicate that the safety margin is therefore very large, for competitive swimmers as well as for leisure swimmers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00984100050136553

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 49

Authors
Benoît Lévesque, P. A.
Venue
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
Published
2000-10-23
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
225-243
ISSN
  • 0098-4108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-7394
  • 1087-2620
OpenAlex
W2131884779
Cited by
49
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
chloroform, indoor swimming pools, occupational exposure, competitive swimmers, water disinfection by-products, cancer risk, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, exercise intensity, safety margin, Quebec City
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Air Pollutants, Child, Chloroform, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Humans, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quebec, Skin Absorption, Swimming, Swimming Pools, Linear Models, Air Pollution, Indoor, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review