Cited by 144Neural Networks and ApplicationsChaos control and synchronizationNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DISCRETE- vs. CONTINUOUS-TIME NONLINEAR SIGNAL PROCESSING OF Cu ELECTRODISSOLUTION DATA

RICO-MARTÍNEZ, R., KRISCHER, K., KEVREKIDIS, I.G., KUBE, M.C., HUDSON, J.L.·1992·Chemical Engineering Communications

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are often used for short term discrete time predictions of experimental data. In this paper we focus on the capability of such nets to correctly identify long term behavior and, in particular, observed bifurcations. As we show, the usual discrete time mapping approach is (precisely because of its discrete nature) often incapable of reproducing observed bifurcation sequences. If the interest is only in periodic or temporally more complicated behavior, a Poincaré map extracted from the experimental time series can be used to circumvent this problem. A complete dynamic picture including bifurcations of steady states can, however, only be captured by a continuous-time model. We present an ANN configuration which couples a “nonlinear principal component” network for data processing (Kramer, 1991, Usui et al., 1990) with a composite ANN based on a simple integrator scheme. This ANN is able to correctly reconstruct the bifurcation diagram of our experimental data. All time series we process stem from the potentiostatic electrodissolution of Cu in phosphoric acid solution. As the applied potential is varied, the electrodissolution rate changes from steady behavior to periodic oscillations, followed by a sequence of period doublings to apparently chaotic motion, and then returns to simple oscillations via a reverse cascade of period doublings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00986449208936084

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bayly B., 1987, J. Sci. Cornp., 2, 111
  2. Doedel E.J., 1981, Cong. Num., 30, 265
  3. Hecht-Nielsen R., 1989, Proc. Intl. Joint Conf. Neural Networks
  4. Lapedes A.S., 1987, Los Alamos Report LA-UR, 87
  5. Usui S., 1990, Proceedings 1990 IEEE INNS IJCNN, 2, 515

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 144

Metadata

Authors
RICO-MARTÍNEZ, R., KRISCHER, K., KEVREKIDIS, I. G., KUBE, M. C., & HUDSON, J. L.
Affiliations
  • a Department of Chemical Engineering , Princeton University , Princeton, NJ, 08544-5263
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Chemical Engineering Communications
Published
1992-11
Volume
118
Issue
1
Pages
25-48
ISSN
  • 0098-6445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1563-5201
OpenAlex
W1976068300
Cited by
144
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Communications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Keywords
bifurcation diagrams, period doubling, Poincaré map, continuous-time neural networks, artificial neural networks, chaotic oscillations, periodic oscillations, phosphoric acid solutions, potentiostatic measurements, nonlinear signal processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review