The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Abstract
framed, and it would be difficult to add anything appreciable to them. It is interesting to note, however, that Titchener, having reviewed the evidence and taken his stand, says that we would all welcome a crucial experiment. It would be worthwhile, I believe, to study the methods of describing color as a function of the mode of appearance, and to search for pertinent stimulus-variables and functions of them correlating with reports of the colors by direct visual estimation. Such a study would constitute a whole series of crucial experiments. Let all abstractions, including those of black and white sensations, be tested for usefulness in color description for all modes of appearance. On this account, we should watch with particular interest the further development of Professor Dimmick's proposal to specify color in all modes of appearance by the seven primaries: red, yellow, green, blue, white, gray, and black, taken four at a time, two chromatic and two achromatic.31 In the meantime, the tentative definition of black and white with which this note was introduced may as well be taken. Its usefulness is exemplified by the psychophysical relation given in Equation [2), and its validity has not been questioned by anyone. Whether it be possible to extend with similar validity and usefulness the definition of black and white to modes of appearance other than surface remains to be decided by further study. National Bureau of Standards DEANE 8. JUDD Washington, D.C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elmer, T., Mepham, K., & Stadtfeld, C. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236337 · Cited by 1,658
McColl, E., Jacoby, A., Thomas, L., Soutter, J., Bamford, C., Steen, N., Thomas, R., Harvey, E., Garratt, A., & Bond, J. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5310 · Cited by 788
Fine-grained and accurate source code differencing
Falleri, J.-R., Morandat, F., Blanc, X., Martinez, M., & Monperrus, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2642937.2642982 · Cited by 549
Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026828 · Cited by 424
Sandler, I. N., Tein, J., & West, S. G. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00846.x · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Venue
- Serials Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 83-85
- ISSN
- 0098-7913 (ISSN-L)
- 1879-095X
- OpenAlex
- W199384682
- Cited by
- 1,410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00987913.1982.10763392
- The paper
- Educational and Psychological Measurement. (1982). Serials Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.1982.10763392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.