The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains
Abstract
(1983). Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education: Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 49-59.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Cited by
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x023007005 · Cited by 2,016
Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057269608560077 · Cited by 1,049
Energy between the life‐world of pupils and the world of physics
Lijnse, P. (1990) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730740507 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-59
- ISSN
- 0140-5284 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996234175
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
