The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflection: a necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development
Abstract
Few discussions on professional development occur without some reference to the central role that reflection plays in the learning life of the teacher. It is the sine qua non of the ‘teacher‐researcher’, ‘action research’ and ‘reflective practitioner’ movements. During the last 20 years there has been a growing body of literature and practices which has sought to identify different levels of reflection in which involvement is essential, it is claimed, for the maximising of teacher growth. Yet much of this has failed to consider the need for reflection to be accompanied by confrontation if development is to occur, and alongside this, the negative and positive roles that organisational culture may play in the provision for different kinds and levels of reflection and confrontation. Two key issues are addressed in this paper. The first relates to our understanding and use of reflection—an essential part of the learning process; and the second, to the need for partnerships and coalitions within collaborative organisational cultures which are necessary to support opportunities for the different kinds of reflection so necessary to learning, and thus contribute to the development of individual professional learning cultures in the 1990s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,752
(2014) · The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,325
Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness
Runkel, P. J., Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1976) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1978718 · Cited by 4,083
(1975) · Cited by 3,515
Action research for educational change
Elliott, J. M. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,581
Issues in Educational Research
Keeves, J. P., & Lakomski, G. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,531
Calderhead, J. (1987) · Cited by 1,015
Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness.
Meyer, M. W., Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1976) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2062989 · Cited by 680
Pearse, H., & Eisner, E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation · doi:10.2307/1494348 · Cited by 666
Cited by
Reframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning
Webster-Wright, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308330970 · Cited by 1,174
Action research and reflective practice: towards a holistic view
Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650790000200108 · Cited by 416
Self-citationTeachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: the role of emotion
Day, C., & Leitch, R. (2001) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00003-8 · Cited by 317
Self-citationMeyer, A., Kleinknecht, M., & Richter, D. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104805 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, C.
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2010804882
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 51.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflection: a necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0141192930190107
- The paper
- Day, C. (1993). Reflection: a necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192930190107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.