The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids
Abstract
We develop a method which permits the analysis of problems requiring the simultaneous resolution of continuum and atomistic length scales-and associated deformation processes-in a unified manner. A finite element methodology furnishes a continuum statement of the problem of interest and provides the requisite multiple-scale analysis capability by adaptively refining the mesh near lattice defects and other highly energetic regions. The method differs from conventional finite element analyses in that interatomic interactions are incorporated into the model through a crystal calculation based on the local state of deformation. This procedure endows the model with crucial properties, such as slip invariance, which enable the emergence of dislocations and other lattice defects. We assess the accuracy of the theory in the atomistic limit by way of three examples: a stacking fault on the (111) plane, and edge dislocations residing on (111) and (100) planes of an aluminium single crystal. The method correctly predicts the splitting of the (111) edge dislocation into Shockley partials. The computed separation of these partials is consistent with results obtained by direct atomistic simulations. The method predicts no splitting of the Al Lomer dislocation, in keeping with observation and the results of direct atomistic simulation. In both cases, the core structures are found to be in good agreement with direct lattice statics calculations, which attests to the accuracy of the method at the atomistic scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method
Ercolessi, F., & Adams, J. B. (1994) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 · Cited by 1,455
Cited by
A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics
Xiao, S. P., & Belytschko, T. (2004) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.053 · Cited by 779
Coupling of atomistic and continuum simulations using a bridging scale decomposition
Wagner, G. J., & Liu, W. K. (2003) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00273-0 · Cited by 659
Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview
Vakis, A. I., Yastrebov, V. A., Scheibert, J., Nicola, L., Dini, D., Minfray, C., Almqvist, A., Paggi, M., Lee, S., Limbert, G., et al. (2018) · Tribology International · doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.005 · Cited by 580
Quantifying the early stages of plasticity through nanoscale experiments and simulations
Van Vliet, K. J., Li, J., Zhu, T., Yip, S., & Suresh, S. (2003) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.104105 · Cited by 391
Eighty Years of the Finite Element Method: Birth, Evolution, and Future
Liu, W. K., Li, S., & Park, H. S. (2022) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09740-9 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Tadmor, E. B., Ortiz, M., & Phillips, R.
- Venue
- Philosophical Magazine A
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1529-1563
- ISSN
- 0141-8610 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-6992
- OpenAlex
- W1997397055
- Cited by
- 1,507
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01418619608243000
- The paper
- Tadmor, E. B., Ortiz, M., & Phillips, R. (1996). Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids. Philosophical Magazine A. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619608243000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.