The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A history of white violence tells us attacks on black academics are not ending (I know because it happened to me)
Abstract
This article examines attacks on black academics as an analytical apparatus for connecting histories of U.S. racial violence to the current state of white backlash against black advancement. Through an anatomy of these attacks – of which the author herself was targeted – this essay explores two processes: First, what these attacks do to blackness and, second, what this violence does for whiteness. In the former, this work explains that attacks on black academics are first and foremost anti-black attacks, not dissimilar to attacks on visible African- Americans in other arenas. The intention is to terrorize black progress on the whole. In the latter process, the generative nature of these attacks reproduces collective white identities across region, age, and newly digitized spaces. In the current political moment this digitized mob violence ritualistically reaffirms white hegemony. This essay concludes with an explanation for why the author believes these attacks will continue with regularity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, racialised scholars report racist trolling and abuse online (Grundy, 2017).”
From Information security for criminological ethnographers (2024) · cites this paper as Grundy, 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Hordge-Freeman Elizabeth, 2011, Rethinking Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods, 92
- Matthew Patricia., 2016, Written/Unwritten: Diversity and the Hidden Truths of Tenure, 10.5149/northcarolina/9781469627717.001.0001 · DOI
- Schrecker Ellen., 2010, The NEA Higher Education Journal, 71
- Zuberi Tukufu, 2008, White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information security for criminological ethnographers
Kindynis, T., & Fleetwood, J. (2024) · Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal · doi:10.1177/17416590231219746 · Cited by 6
“Likewise, racialised scholars report racist trolling and abuse online (Grundy, 2017).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Grundy, S.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grundy, Saida
- ORCID
- Grundy, Saida
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1864-1871
- ISSN
- 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4356
- OpenAlex
- W2724356521
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- racial violence, white backlash, anti-Black racism, whiteness, white hegemony, mob violence, racial terror, white identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review