The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture
Abstract
Terms such as transnational social spaces, transnational social fields or transnationalism usually refer to sustained ties of persons, networks and organizations across the borders across multiple nation-states, ranging from little to highly institutionalized forms. However, there are two large conceptual gaps in the study of transnational social spaces arising out of international migration and refugee flows. First, terms such as transnational social spaces and transnational communities are often used synonymously, as if 'transnational community' were the only form or type of transnational social space. This analysis outlines the primary mechanisms operative in transnationalization: reciprocity in small groups, exchange in circuits and solidarity in communities. These mechanisms correspond to distinct types of transnational social spaces - transnational kinship groups, transnational circuits and transnational communities. Second, the implications of transnationalization for citizenship and culture have not been systematically explored. The concept of border-crossing expansion of social ties also helps to enrich our understanding of immigrant integration in the political and cultural realms. There is an elective affinity between the three broad concepts to explain and describe immigrant adaptation: assimilation, ethnic pluralism and border-crossing expansion of social space, on the one hand, and the concepts used to describe citizenship and culture, on the other hand. In the political realm the concepts are national, multicultural and transnational citizenship; and in the cultural sphere, acculturation, cultural retention and transnational syncretism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Cited by
Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society
Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x · Cited by 2,787
Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation
Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O'Brien, K. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1666 · Cited by 1,456
Bordering solidarities: migrant activism and the politics of movement and camps at Calais
Rygiel, K. (2011) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.534911 · Cited by 384
(Re)producing Salvadoran Transnational Geographies
Bailey, A. J., Wright, R. A., Mountz, A., & Miyares, I. M. (2002) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00283 · Cited by 280
Sending States and the Making of Intra-Diasporic Politics: Turkey and Its Diaspora(s)
Adamson, F. B. (2019) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1177/0197918318767665 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Faist, T.
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-222
- ISSN
- 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4356
- OpenAlex
- W2090694956
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014198700329024
- The paper
- Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198700329024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.