Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simulation and new learning technologies

Issenberg, Barry, Gordon, Michael S, Gordon, David Lee, Safford, Robert E, Hart, Ian R.·2001·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Changes in medical practice that limit patient availability and instructors' time have resulted in poor physical diagnosis skills by learners at all levels. Advanced simulation technology, including the use of sophisticated multimedia computer systems, helps to address this problem. For many years 'Harvey', the Cardiology Patient Simulator, and the UMedic Multimedia Computer system have proven to be effective tools to teach and assess bedside cardiovascular skills when they are integrated into the required curriculum of medical school and postgraduate training. In the future, virtual reality technology, based initially on data from the Visible Human Data set, will provide the majority of simulation-based training. Models that provide a high level of visual fidelity and use sophisticated haptic devices that simulate the 'touch' and 'feel' of a procedure or examination are now being used in selected medical centers. The presence of these tools is not enough. Evidence-based outcomes must show these systems to be effective instruments for teaching and assessment, and medical educators must be willing to effect change in medical education to ensure the appropriate use of these systems in the next millennium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01421590020007324

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Issenberg, B., Gordon, M. S., Gordon, D. L., Safford, R. E., & Hart, I. R.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2001-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
16-23
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2116331413
Cited by
175
References
1
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation and new learning technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01421590020007324
The paper
Issenberg, B., Gordon, M. S., Gordon, D. L., Safford, R. E., & Hart, I. R. (2001). Simulation and new learning technologies. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590020007324

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.