Burnout assessment in house officers: Evaluation of an intervention to reduce stress
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medical house officers are at increased risk for stress related symptoms leading to professional burnout. AIMS: Measure burnout in house officers and establish whether utilization of a psychotherapeutic tool individually by physicians reduces symptoms characteristic of burnout. METHOD: Two groups of pediatric house officers at the University of California Davis Health System completed a Maslach Burnout Survey (MBS) at the beginning and end of a three-month period in 2003. An Intervention group (7 of 15 enrolled) was trained in the use of a self-administered psychotherapeutic tool. Outcome Measures were MBS scores and a qualitative interview of intervention group members. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups, prior to the study or over time. Qualitative interviews revealed that subjects experience stressors in relation to their professional activities, but already utilize some elements of the tool and were too busy to implement the entire tool systematically. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric trainees did not seem to manifest burnout symptoms based upon the MBS; interviews suggested that some do experience significant stress, although manifestations and responses were varied, some may be at risk. Methods identifying individuals at risk for burnout, and interventions to cope with stress may be valuable to their training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the coaching intervention subgroup, emotional exhaustion (EE) was significantly reduced: Cohen's d SMD -0.24 (95% CI -0.40 to -0.07, p = 0.04, I2 = 41.6%).
“Subgroup analyses of coaching intervention [59–72, 74, 75] demonstrated a post-intervention Cohen’s d SMD in EE (-0.24, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.07, p = 0.04, I2 = 41.6%).”
From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Eight studies (72.7%) were categorized as high risk of bias in the second or third domain due to naive per protocol analysis from complete cases at the end of the studies.
“Also, 8 studies [45, 51, 52, 57, 63, 64, 74], comprising 72.7% of the total, were categorized as high risk of bias in the second or third domain due to naive per protocol analysis from complete cases at the end of the studies.”
From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Milstein, J. M., Raingruber, B. J., Bennett, S. H., Kon, A. A., Winn, C. A., & Paterniti, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- UC Davis Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Milstein, Jay M.
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-341
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2171590972
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- burnout, pediatric residents, occupational stress, stress reduction intervention, Maslach Burnout Inventory, physician well-being, medical training
- MeSH terms
- Burnout, Professional, California, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Psychotherapy, Stress, Psychological, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review