Cited by 49Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Burnout assessment in house officers: Evaluation of an intervention to reduce stress

Milstein, Jay M., Raingruber, Bonnie J., Bennett, Stephen H., Kon, Alexander A., Winn, Cynthia A., Paterniti, Debora A.·2009·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical house officers are at increased risk for stress related symptoms leading to professional burnout. AIMS: Measure burnout in house officers and establish whether utilization of a psychotherapeutic tool individually by physicians reduces symptoms characteristic of burnout. METHOD: Two groups of pediatric house officers at the University of California Davis Health System completed a Maslach Burnout Survey (MBS) at the beginning and end of a three-month period in 2003. An Intervention group (7 of 15 enrolled) was trained in the use of a self-administered psychotherapeutic tool. Outcome Measures were MBS scores and a qualitative interview of intervention group members. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups, prior to the study or over time. Qualitative interviews revealed that subjects experience stressors in relation to their professional activities, but already utilize some elements of the tool and were too busy to implement the entire tool systematically. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric trainees did not seem to manifest burnout symptoms based upon the MBS; interviews suggested that some do experience significant stress, although manifestations and responses were varied, some may be at risk. Methods identifying individuals at risk for burnout, and interventions to cope with stress may be valuable to their training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01421590802208552

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 49

Authors
Milstein, J. M., Raingruber, B. J., Bennett, S. H., Kon, A. A., Winn, C. A., & Paterniti, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
  • UC Davis Health (US)
Corresponding author
Milstein, Jay M.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2009-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
338-341
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2171590972
Cited by
49
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout, pediatric residents, occupational stress, stress reduction intervention, Maslach Burnout Inventory, physician well-being, medical training
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, California, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Psychotherapy, Stress, Psychological, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review