Cited by 60Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchWorkaholism, burnout, and well-being

Work engagement in medical students: An exploratory analysis of the relationship between engagement, burnout, perceived stress, lifestyle factors, and medical student attitudes

Agarwal, Gaurava, Mosquera, Matthew, Ring, Melinda, Victorson, David·2020·Medical Teacher

Abstract

There is a need to expand the current focus of burnout in medical trainees so that we can understand not only trainee distress but also trainee well-being. Work engagement as measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-15 (UWES-15) is a positive construct that is conceptually related to burnout and is a component of the Job Demands-Resources Model (JD-R). We sought to explore the relationship of work engagement to burnout, perceived stress, lifestyle factors, and medical student attitudes to testing whether work engagement could serve as a positive construct to study medical student well-being. We surveyed 287 1st and 2nd-year medical students at a large academic medical center in the United States. Our survey consisted of demographic measures, UWES-15, Burnout Measure short version, Perceived Stress Scale-4, lifestyle factors, and medical student attitudes. Statistical analysis revealed work engagement is negatively correlated with burnout and perceived stress. Work engagement and its subscales are correlated to exercise, sleep, drugs and alcohol use, maintaining relationships, and financial stress. Work engagement is negatively correlated with thoughts of dropping out and questioning the decision to enter medical school. Work engagement can be a useful measure to assess medical student well-being and identify areas for intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2019.1679746

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 60

Authors
Agarwal, G., Mosquera, M., Ring, M., & Victorson, D.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Agarwal, Gaurava
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2019-11-02
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
299-305
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2987325807
Cited by
60
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Keywords
work engagement, medical students, burnout, perceived stress, lifestyle factors, medical student well-being, job demands-resources model, physical activity, sleep, alcohol and drug use, financial stress
MeSH terms
Work Engagement, Burnout, Psychological, Attitude, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Life Style, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review