Transcending boundaries for collaborative patient care
Open accessAbstract
Dutch general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists (MSs) create collaborative patient care agreements (CPCAs) to improve intraprofessional collaboration. We set out to identify contradictions between the activity systems of primary and secondary care that could result in expansive learning and new ways of working collaboratively. We analysed nineteen semi-structured interviews using activity theory (AT) as a theoretical framework and using these two activity systems as the units of analysis. There were contradictions within and between the activity systems related, for example, to different understandings of 'care' in generalist and specialist settings. GPs and MSs were able to identify contradictions and learn expansively when they iteratively co-created CPCAs in groups. They found it much harder to tackle contradictions, however, when they disseminated these tools within their respective professional communities, leaving unresolved contradictions and missed opportunities for collaboration. This research shows the educational benefits of taking collective responsibility for improving collaborative patient care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Expertise in Transition: Expansive Learning in Medical Work
Engeström, Y. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781139023009 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning
Engeström, Y., & Pyörälä, E. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1795105 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Dornan, T., Kearney, G. P., & Pyörälä, E. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1795102 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Meijer, L. J., de Groot, E., Honing-de Lange, G., Kearney, G., Schellevis, F. G., & Damoiseaux, R. A. M. J.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Department of General Practice, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centre for Medical Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Meijer, Loes J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-31
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W3048358393
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- general practitioners, specialist physicians, interprofessional collaboration, activity theory, activity systems, contradiction, expansive learning, primary care, secondary care, professional community, co-creation
- MeSH terms
- Patient Care, Humans, Learning, Medicine, Specialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review