Cultural capital and academic achievement in post-socialist Eastern Europe
Abstract
Using the 2000 and 2009 waves of Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) data, we examined the relationships between family socio-economic status (SES), cultural capital, and reading achievement among students in five post-socialist Eastern European countries while comparing the findings with three Western bench-marking countries. Findings: In all studied countries, higher-SES students possessed higher levels of cultural capital and exhibited higher reading achievement. Cultural capital was uniformly positively associated with reading achievement. We found the least stratification by SES in Russia both in the distribution of cultural capital and reading achievement. The findings provide no evidence of the overall decline of the importance of cultural capital over time; most of the associations between cultural capital measures and reading achievement remained stable across the waves. Between-country variation in the findings does not indicate East–West divide (with the exception of Russia).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Socio-economic background and gender are believed to affect student achievement.
“We also included socio-economic background and gender as contextual variables since these characteristics are believed to affect student achievement (e.g., Bodovski, Jeon, & Byun, 2017;Pfeffer, 2008;Parker et al., 2018).”
From Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement (2019) · cites this paper as Bodovski, Jeon, & Byun, 2017
Cites
Strand, S. (2014) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2013.767370 · Cited by 252 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In fact, prior research shows that SES gap decreases substantially when prior achievement is taken into account (Bodovski 2010; Strand 2014).”
BackgroundSzel�nyi, I., & Szel�nyi, S. (1995) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00993400 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Parental Mediation and Adolescents’ Internet Use: The Moderating Role of Parenting Style
Ren, W., & Zhu, X. (2022) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-022-01600-w · Cited by 116 · see citing works
How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement
Sedova, K., & Sedlacek, M. (2023) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bodovski, K., Jeon, H., & Byun, S.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Bodovski, Katerina
- Venue
- British Journal of Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-06-27
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 887-907
- ISSN
- 0142-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3346
- OpenAlex
- W2465472468
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Keywords
- cultural capital, academic performance, reading achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational inequality, post-socialist education, PISA, cross-national comparison, East-West divide, Russia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review