Cited by 21Literacy and Educational PracticesCultural Capital and Social ClassYouth Culture and Social Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Fitting in’ and ‘standing out’: the peer group and young people’s development of reader identity

Sellers, Chelsea·2019·British Journal of Sociology of Education

Abstract

The benefits of reading for pleasure and positive reader identities have been well established in previous research. However, much discussion regarding young people’s reading is underpinned by a discourse of deficit, placing emphasis on what young people should be reading. In an attempt to move away from this discourse, this article considers reading in the context of young people’s broader social and cultural worlds, exploring the role of the peer group in young people’s development of a reader identity. The article argues that the reading practices young people engage in are part of their broader social and cultural participation and, consequently, part of a broader project of identity formation. By highlighting the complexity of young people’s development of a reader identity and the meaning ascribed to specific reading practices, the findings challenge deficit models of young people’s reading lives, which underpin attempts to redistribute cultural capital through educational and cultural policy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01425692.2019.1622407

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1177/1360780418769672 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/01596306.2012.698865 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/1749975516639083 · DOI
  4. Bartlett L, 2007, Teachers College Record, 109, 51, 10.1177/016146810710900109 · DOI
  5. Bartlett L., 2002, Ways of Knowing Journal, 2, 10
  6. Bartlett M, 2012, Screen Education, 66, 8
  7. Burnard P, 2004, The Mountain Lake Reader: Conversations on the Study and Practice of Music Teaching, 8
  8. 10.1080/00405841.2012.690312 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01072.x · DOI
  10. 10.1080/09585176.2012.744697 · DOI
  11. Crook C. J, 1997, Cultural Practices and Socioeconomic Attainment: The Australian Experience.
  12. 10.1080/09585176.2014.892017 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.002 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/10862969909548052 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13676261.2015.1098778 · DOI
  16. Jaeger E. L, 2016, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 56, 1
  17. 10.1080/1358684X.2015.1049513 · DOI
  18. Lareau A, 2000, Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education
  19. Lareau A, 2003, Unequal Childhoods: Race, Class, and Family Life
  20. Luke A, 2014, Moving Critical Literacies Forward: A New Look at Praxis across Contexts, 19
  21. 10.1080/02680939.2018.1449891 · DOI
  22. 10.1598/RRQ.41.2.1 · DOI
  23. Marsh J., 2000, Literacy and Popular Culture: Using Children’s Culture in the Classroom, 10.4135/9781446219829 · DOI
  24. Moss G, 2010, Literacy and Gender: Researching Texts, Contexts and Readers
  25. Neuman S. B., 2012, Giving Our Children a Fighting Chance: Poverty, Literacy, and the Development of Information Capital.
  26. Power S., 2016, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 590
  27. 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.06.002 · DOI
  28. Rogers Cherland M, 1994, Private Practices: Girls Reading Fiction and Constructing Identity
  29. 10.1080/01425692.2013.826899 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/13676260600635599 · DOI
  31. 10.1353/sdn.2010.0009 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.001 · DOI
  33. Street B, 1984, Literacy in Theory and Practice
  34. 10.1177/0038038501035004006 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1080/01425692.2017.1304814 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/01411920701609380 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wannamaker A, 2008, Boys in Children’s Literature and Popular Culture: Masculinity, Abjection, and the Fictional Child, 46
  38. 10.1080/1358684X.2012.704579 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/eie.12064 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/eie.12094 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Sellers, C.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Sellers, Chelsea
Venue
British Journal of Sociology of Education
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
938-952
ISSN
  • 0142-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3346
OpenAlex
W2951650567
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Sociology of Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Education at the University of York
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Culture and Social Dynamics
Keywords
reader identity, peer groups, identity construction, reading for pleasure, cultural participation, cultural capital, reading practices, deficit discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review