The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping of several soil properties using DAIS-7915 hyperspectral scanner data - a case study over clayey soils in Israel
Abstract
The data acquired from the hyperspectral airborne sensor DAIS-7915 over Izrael Valley in northern Israel was processed to yield quantitative soil properties maps of organic matter, soil field moisture, soil saturated moisture, and soil salinity. The method adopted for this purpose was the Visible and Near Infrared Analysis (VNIRA) approach, which yields an empirical model for predicting the soil property in question from both wet chemistry and spectral information of a representative set of samples (calibration set). Based on spectral laboratory data that show a significant capability to predict the above soil properties and populations using the VNIRA strategy, the next step was to examine this feasibility under a hyperspectral remote sensing (HSR) domain. After atmospherically rectifying the DAIS-7915 data and omitting noisy bands, the VNIRA routine was performed to yield a prediction equation model for each property, using the reflectance image data. Applying this equation on a pixel-bypixel basis revealed images that described spatially and quantitatively the surface distribution of each property. The VNIRA results were validated successfully from a priori knowledge of the area characteristics and from data collected from several sampling points. Following these examinations, a procedure was developed in order to create a soil property map of the entire area, including soils under vegetated areas. This procedure employed a random selection of more than 80 points along non-vegetated areas from the quantitative soil property images and interpolation of the points to yield an isocontour map for each property. It is concluded that the VNIRA method is a promising strategy for quantitative soil surface mapping, furthermore, the method could even be improved if a better quality of HSR data were used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints
Metternicht, G. I., & Zinck, J. A. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00188-8 · Cited by 1,115
Remote Sensing Techniques for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation: A Review
Angelopoulou, T., Tziolas, N., Balafoutis, A., Zalidis, G., & Bochtis, D. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11060676 · Cited by 382
Lagacherie, P., Baret, F., Feret, J.-B., Madeira Netto, J., & Robbez-Masson, J. M. (2008) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.06.014 · Cited by 295
Assessment and monitoring of soil quality using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)
Cécillon, L., Barthès, B. G., Gomez, C., Ertlen, D., Genot, V., Hedde, M., Stevens, A., & Brun, J. J. (2009) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01178.x · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Ben-Dor, E., Patkin, K., Banin, A., & Karnieli, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1043-1062
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W1991039337
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping of several soil properties using DAIS-7915 hyperspectral scanner data - a case study over clayey soils in Israel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01431160010006962
- The paper
- Ben-Dor, E., Patkin, K., Banin, A., & Karnieli, A. (2002). Mapping of several soil properties using DAIS-7915 hyperspectral scanner data - a case study over clayey soils in Israel. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160010006962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.