The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remote survey of large-scale braided, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis
Abstract
The use of conventional survey methods to monitor large, gravel river beds has traditionally led to a reliance on repeat measurements of cross-sections which, unless very closely spaced, may give unreliable information about three-dimensional channel morphology and morphological change. Provided certain technological limitations can be overcome, remote survey techniques, such as digital photogrammetry and airborne laser scanning, remove the spatial and temporal constraints typically associated with ground-based surveys, allowing high spatial resolution, distributed, elevation mapping of gravel river beds. This paper develops the use of digital photogrammetry for the survey of a 3.3 km reach of the braided Waimakariri River, New Zealand, which, when combined with image analysis of water colour to infer water depth, provides a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the entire river bed. Central to the successful application of this method is DEM post-processing. Errors take two forms: (i) individual point errors associated with incorrect stereo-matching during automated data collection; and (ii) spatially-variable systematic errors that are associated with uncertainties in sensor position and orientation as determined during the bundle adjustment. An automated post-processing procedure is developed to deal with individual point errors and this improves DEM surface quality in terms of accuracy, precision and internal reliability. Systematic errors in the final DEM surface were reduced by applying a simple correction based on surveyed photo-control point elevations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets
Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E., & Sear, D. A. (2010) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1886 · Cited by 1,160
Woodget, A. S., Carbonneau, P. E., Visser, F., & Maddock, I. P. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3613 · Cited by 424
Aggett, G. R., & Wilson, J. P. (2009) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.034 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Westaway, R. M., Lane, S. N., & Hicks, D. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 795-815
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2011738126
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote survey of large-scale braided, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01431160110113070
- The paper
- Westaway, R. M., Lane, S. N., & Hicks, D. M. (2003). Remote survey of large-scale braided, gravel-bed rivers using digital photogrammetry and image analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110113070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.