The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping
Abstract
This publication reports results of an experiment carried out to examine the potential of polarimetric C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) for mapping various wetland classes found in the Mer Bleue region (near Ottawa, Canada). The Mer Bleue region was surveyed by the C-band (5.3 GHz) polarimetric (HH, HV, VH, VV) SAR of the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) at three times within the vegetation season: 16 June (spring flush for vegetation), 6 July (mature growth stage for vegetation) and 3 October 1995 (senescence). Signatures of six different cover types (forested and nonforested peat bog, marsh, open water, clearing and forests) have been derived as a function of incidence angle. Separability between various classes was used to determine the relationships between season(s) and polarization(s) needed to differentiate various wetland classes. A supervised classification was used for wetlands mapping by means of multipolarization data. These investigations demonstrate some of the capabilities of SAR at C-band for mapping wetlands. The cross-polarization data provided the best separation between the observed classes. The October dataset was better suited for discriminating between the classes present than the other periods observed. The overall accuracies of the classification are 73% for June, 73% for July and 86% for October. Classification using a single polarization has been investigated and the results have shown that the HH and cross-polarizations are better than VV polarization. For October, the percentage of all pixels correctly classified is 74% for HH polarization, 76% for cross-polarization, and 59% for VV polarization. Investigations were carried out to determine whether temporal changes can be used to increase the information content of single polarization C-band SAR data, which are now available from ERS-2 and RADARSAT satellites. They demonstrated that the use of multitemporal data acquired in June, July and October do not provide a substantial amelioration of the classification of wetlands when the differentiation is not possible in any single period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Envisat multi‐polarized ASAR data for flood mapping
Henry, J. ‐., Chastanet, P., Fellah, K., & Desnos, Y. ‐. (2006) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160500486724 · Cited by 287
Remote Sensing of Floods and Flood-Prone Areas: An Overview
Klemas, V. (2015) · Journal of Coastal Research · doi:10.2112/jcoastres-d-14-00160.1 · Cited by 220
Psomiadis, E., Diakakis, M., & Soulis, K. X. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12233980 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Baghdadi, N., Bernier, M., Gauthier, R., & Neeson, I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-88
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2115076670
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014311601750038857
- The paper
- Baghdadi, N., Bernier, M., Gauthier, R., & Neeson, I. (2001). Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311601750038857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.