Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,226

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Change detection techniques

Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., Moran, E.·2004·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

Timely and accurate change detection of Earth's surface features is extremely important for understanding relationships and interactions between human and natural phenomena in order to promote better decision making. Remote sensing data are primary sources extensively used for change detection in recent decades. Many change detection techniques have been developed. This paper summarizes and reviews these techniques. Previous literature has shown that image differencing, principal component analysis and post-classification comparison are the most common methods used for change detection. In recent years, spectral mixture analysis, artificial neural networks and integration of geographical information system and remote sensing data have become important techniques for change detection applications. Different change detection algorithms have their own merits and no single approach is optimal and applicable to all cases. In practice, different algorithms are often compared to find the best change detection results for a specific application. Research of change detection techniques is still an active topic and new techniques are needed to effectively use the increasingly diverse and complex remotely sensed data available or projected to be soon available from satellite and airborne sensors. This paper is a comprehensive exploration of all the major change detection approaches implemented as found in the literature. Abbreviations used in this paper 6S second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum ANN artificial neural networks ASTER Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer AVHRR Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer AVIRIS Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer CVA change vector analysis EM expectation–maximization algorithm ERS-1 Earth Resource Satellite-1 ETM+ Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus, Landsat 7 satellite image GIS Geographical Information System GS Gramm–Schmidt transformation J-M distance Jeffries–Matusita distance KT Kauth–Thomas transformation or tasselled cap transformation LSMA linear spectral mixture analysis LULC land use and land cover MODIS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer MSAVI Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index MSS Landsat Multi-Spectral Scanner image NDMI Normalized Difference Moisture Index NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration PCA principal component analysis RGB red, green and blue colour composite RTB ratio of tree biomass to total aboveground biomass SAR synthetic aperture radar SAVI Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index SPOT HRV Satellite Probatoire d'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) high resolution visible image TM Thematic Mapper VI Vegetation Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0143116031000139863

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,226

Metadata

Authors
Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E.
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2004-06
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
2365-2401
ISSN
  • 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5901
OpenAlex
W2165577558
Cited by
3,226
References
0
FWCI
134.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Change detection techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0143116031000139863
The paper
Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139863

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.