Cited by 136Marine Plankton and BiogeochemistryOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Global monitoring of plankton blooms using MERIS MCI.

Gower, J., King, S., Goncalves, P.·2008·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

The MERIS maximum chlorophyll index (MCI), measuring the radiance peak at 709 nm in water‐leaving radiance, indicates the presence of a high surface concentration of chlorophyll a against a scattering background. The index is high in ‘red tide’ conditions (intense, visible, surface, plankton blooms) and is raised when aquatic vegetation is present. A bloom search based on the MCI has resulted in the detection of a variety of events in Canadian, Antarctic and other waters round the world, as well as detection of extensive areas of pelagic vegetation (Sargassum spp.), previously unreported in the scientific literature. Since 1 June 2006, global MCI composite images, at a spatial resolution of 5 km, are being produced daily from all MERIS (daylight) passes of reduced resolution (RR) data. The global composites significantly increase the area now being searched for events, although the reduced spatial resolution may cause smaller events to be missed. This paper describes the composites and gives examples of plankton bloom events that they have detected. It also shows how the composites are affected by the South Atlantic anomaly (SAA), where cosmic rays impact the detectors of the MERIS instrument.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01431160802178110

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1080/01431169208904125 · DOI
  2. Gower J. F. R., 1999, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9, 1771, 10.1080/014311699212470 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01431160500075857 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TGRS.2006.882258 · DOI
  5. Gower J. F. R., 2007, Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L15501
  6. Smetacek V., 1992, Deep‐Sea Research, 39, 153, 10.1016/0198-0149(92)90102-Y · DOI
  7. 10.1093/plankt/17.11.2155 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gower, J., King, S., & Goncalves, P.
Affiliations
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
  • Terradue (Italy) (IT)
Corresponding author
Gower, J.
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2008-10-23
Volume
29
Issue
21
Pages
6209-6216
ISSN
  • 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5901
OpenAlex
W2021063716
Cited by
136
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Space Agency
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
plankton blooms, red tide, MERIS, chlorophyll a, water-leaving radiance, Sargassum, South Atlantic Anomaly, cosmic rays, ocean color remote sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review