Accuracy validation and comparison of global digital elevation models over Croatia
Abstract
Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models (DEMs) plays an important role in facing their use in geoscience applications. This study investigates the vertical accuracy of most recently published versions of global DEMs over Croatia: 1 arc-minute global relief model (ETOPO1), Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation (GTOPO30), SRTM30+, Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010), Altimeter Corrected Elevations 2 DEM (ACE2 DEM), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission GDEM (SRTM GDEM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection GDEM (ASTER GDEM). Geodetic ground control points (benchmarks) allowed the comparison in terms of vertical accuracy. Additionally, the differences between models in the identical points were determined and analysed after adjusting the models to the same resolution. The results have yielded information about the overall accuracy of models; the accuracy depending on height, land cover, and slope; presence of large and systematic errors; and mutual agreement between the models.Overall vertical accuracies according to the root mean square error over Croatia are: ETOPO1 27.6 m, GTOPO30 21.6 m, SRTM30+ 21.3 m, GMTED2010 7.4 m, ACE2 DEM 4.5 m, SRTM GDEM 3.8 m, and ASTER GDEM 7.1 m. The highest accuracy was shown by SRTM GDEM version 3, which is far better than the previously released versions. All models have proved to be worse in the rough and forest areas, whereas in flat and barelands, new-generation global DEMs SRTM GDEM, and ASTER GDEM are highly accurate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Slope is a terrain attribute that represents the magnitude of the terrain inclination and is a measure of the change of elevation over a horizontal distance.
“Slope is a terrain attribute that represents the magnitude of the terrain inclination and is a measure of the change of elevation over a horizontal distance (Varga and Bašić 2015).”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Varga and Bašić 2015
The vertical accuracy of global DEMs is more affected by terrain roughness.
“Since the vertical accuracy of global DEMs is more affected by the terrain roughness(Mukherjee et al. 2013;Szabó, Singh, and Szabó 2015;Varga and Bašić 2015;Jain et al. 2017), its influence on DEMs vertical accuracy was analyzed.”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Varga and Bašić 2015
Prior studies have also observed that RMS and NMAD values of global DEMs generally increase with terrain slope.
“These observations were also done byJain et al. (2017)andVarga and Bašić (2015).”
From Vertical accuracy evaluation of freely available latest high-resolution (30 m) global digital elevation models over Cameroon (Central Africa) with GPS/leveling ground control points. (2019) · cites this paper as Varga and Bašić (2015)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generating 3D city models without elevation data
Biljecki, F., Ledoux, H., & Stoter, J. (2017) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.001 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Yap, L., Kandé, L. H., Nouayou, R., Kamguia, J., Ngouh, N. A., & Makuate, M. B. (2019) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1458163 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Varga, M., & Bašić, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Varga, Matej
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-189
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2071533815
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Keywords
- global digital elevation models, vertical accuracy, DEM accuracy assessment, ASTER GDEM, ETOPO1, GTOPO30, Croatia, slope effects, systematic errors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review