Cited by 78Satellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryGeodetic Measurements and Engineering StructuresGNSS positioning and interference

Accuracy validation and comparison of global digital elevation models over Croatia

Varga, Matej, Bašić, Tomislav·2015·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models (DEMs) plays an important role in facing their use in geoscience applications. This study investigates the vertical accuracy of most recently published versions of global DEMs over Croatia: 1 arc-minute global relief model (ETOPO1), Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation (GTOPO30), SRTM30+, Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010), Altimeter Corrected Elevations 2 DEM (ACE2 DEM), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission GDEM (SRTM GDEM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection GDEM (ASTER GDEM). Geodetic ground control points (benchmarks) allowed the comparison in terms of vertical accuracy. Additionally, the differences between models in the identical points were determined and analysed after adjusting the models to the same resolution. The results have yielded information about the overall accuracy of models; the accuracy depending on height, land cover, and slope; presence of large and systematic errors; and mutual agreement between the models.Overall vertical accuracies according to the root mean square error over Croatia are: ETOPO1 27.6 m, GTOPO30 21.6 m, SRTM30+ 21.3 m, GMTED2010 7.4 m, ACE2 DEM 4.5 m, SRTM GDEM 3.8 m, and ASTER GDEM 7.1 m. The highest accuracy was shown by SRTM GDEM version 3, which is far better than the previously released versions. All models have proved to be worse in the rough and forest areas, whereas in flat and barelands, new-generation global DEMs SRTM GDEM, and ASTER GDEM are highly accurate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01431161.2014.994720

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varga, M., & Bašić, T.
Affiliations
University of Zagreb (HR)
Corresponding author
Varga, Matej
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2015-01-02
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
170-189
ISSN
  • 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5901
OpenAlex
W2071533815
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
Keywords
global digital elevation models, vertical accuracy, DEM accuracy assessment, ASTER GDEM, ETOPO1, GTOPO30, Croatia, slope effects, systematic errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review