ELM-based spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral images using extended morphological profiles and composite feature mappings
Abstract
Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) is a supervised learning technique for a class of feedforward neural networks with random weights that has recently been used with success for the classification of hyperspectral images. In this work, we show that the morphological techniques can be integrated in this kind of classifiers using several composite feature mappings which are proposed for ELM. In particular, we present a spectral–spatial ELM-based classifier for hyperspectral remote-sensing images that integrates the information provided by extended morphological profiles. The proposed spectral–spatial classifier allows different weights for both spatial and spectral features, outperforming other ELM-based classifiers in terms of accuracy for land-cover applications. The accuracy classification results are also better than those obtained by equivalent spectral–spatial Support-Vector-Machine-based classifiers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most recent ways involving classification using hyperspectral data include extreme learning machine (ELM), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and various deep learning algorithms.
“The most recent ways involving classification using hyperspectral data include extreme learning machine (ELM) [7–9], partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) [10,11], and various deep learning algorithms [12,13].”
From Development of online classification system for construction waste based on industrial camera and hyperspectral camera (2019) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Exploring ELM-based spatial–spectral classification of hyperspectral images
Heras, D. B., Argüello, F., & Quesada-Barriuso, P. (2014) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2013.869633 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xiao, W., Yang, J., Fang, H., Zhuang, J., & Ku, Y. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208706 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Argüello, F., & Heras, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Argüello, Francisco
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-17
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 645-664
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W1975435738
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education and Science of Spain (TIN 2010-1754)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
- Keywords
- extreme learning machine, hyperspectral image classification, spectral-spatial classification, morphological features, land cover classification, support vector machine comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review