The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An integrated UAV-borne lidar system for 3D habitat mapping in three forest ecosystems across China
Abstract
In recent decades, global biodiversity has gradually diminished due to the increasing pressure from anthropogenic activities and climatic change. Accurate estimations of spatially continuous three-dimensional (3D) vegetation structures and terrain information are prerequisites for biodiversity studies, which are usually unavailable in current ecosystem-wide studies. Although the airborne lidar technique has been successfully used for mapping 3D vegetation structures at landscape and regional scales, the relatively high cost of airborne lidar flight mission has significantly limited its applications. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) provides an alternative platform for lidar data acquisition, which can largely lower the cost and provide denser lidar points compared with airborne lidar. In this study, we implemented a low-cost UAV-borne lidar system, including both a hardware system and a software system, to collect and process lidar data for biodiversity studies. The implemented UAV-borne lidar system was tested in three different ecosystems across China, including a needleleaf–broadleaf mixed forest, an evergreen broadleaf forest, and a mangrove forest. Various 3D vegetation structure parameters (e.g. canopy height model, canopy cover, leaf area index, aboveground biomass) were derived from the UAV-borne lidar data. The results show that the implemented UAV-borne lidar system can generate very high resolution 3D terrain and vegetation information. The developed UAV-based hardware and software systems provide a turn-key solution for the use of UAV-borne lidar data on biodiversity studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 1×
“Biodiversity, a general term referring to the variety and variability of life on Earth, is an important factor that influences the ecosystem services to humanity, especially the regulating services (Cardinale et al. 2012).”
BackgroundPimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., & Brooks, T. M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · Cited by 2,230
Cited by
Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future
Jiménez López, J., & Mulero-Pázmány, M. (2019) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones3010010 · Cited by 300
Liu, X., Su, Y., Hu, T., Yang, Q., Liu, B., Deng, Y., Tang, H., Tang, Z., Fang, J., & Guo, Q. (2022) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112844 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, Q., Su, Y., Hu, T., Zhao, X., Wu, F., Li, Y., Liu, J., Chen, L., Xu, G., Lin, G., Zheng, Y., Lin, Y., Mi, X., Fei, L., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-01-31
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8-10
- Pages
- 2954-2972
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2585255211
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated UAV-borne lidar system for 3D habitat mapping in three forest ecosystems across China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01431161.2017.1285083
- The paper
- Guo, Q., Su, Y., Hu, T., Zhao, X., Wu, F., Li, Y., Liu, J., Chen, L., Xu, G., Lin, G., Zheng, Y., Lin, Y., Mi, X., Fei, L., & Wang, X. (2017). An integrated UAV-borne lidar system for 3D habitat mapping in three forest ecosystems across China. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1285083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.