The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations
Abstract
The spatial resolution of the next generation of sensors for the global monitoring of vegetation is assessed with particular reference to the proposed Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). The main innovative use of such instruments will lie in their ability to monitor land transformations at global and continental scales. Reliable monitoring is shown to rely on the success with which the changes in the phenomena being analysed can be separated from other temporal changes. Depending on the type of spatial change being monitored, sensor properties such as accuracy of registration, resolution and radiometric sensitivity are shown to have greatest importance. An empirical investigation of the required spatial resolution is based on eight Landsat multispectral scanner system images of the normalized difference vegetation index degraded to candidate resolutions between 250 m and 4000 m. Pairs of images from different dates were registered and different images were then generated. Spatial analysis by Fourier and scale variance analyses indicate that resolutions finer than I km are highly desirable for change detection. A resolution of 250 m will probably generate an impractically high quantity of data on a global basis if all the proposed spectral bands are included. A sensor with a resolution of 500 m is recommended as providing the best compromise between detail of changes detected and the size of the resultant data volume but several other options are also suggested, including one involving one or two finer resolution bands to assist multitemporal registration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MODIS: advanced facility instrument for studies of the Earth as a system
Salomonson, V. V., Barnes, W. L., Maymon, P. W., Montgomery, H. E., & Ostrow, H. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.20292 · Cited by 1,051
Sexton, J. O., Song, X.-P., Feng, M., Noojipady, P., Anand, A., Huang, C., Kim, D.-H., Collins, K. M., Channan, S., DiMiceli, C., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2013.786146 · Cited by 829
Self-citationFifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar
HARPER, G. J., STEININGER, M. K., TUCKER, C. J., JUHN, D., & HAWKINS, F. (2007) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892907004262 · Cited by 734
Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring
Mayaux, P., Holmgren, P., Achard, F., Eva, H., Stibig, H.-J., & Branthomme, A. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1590 · Cited by 409
An incentive mechanism for reducing emissions from conversion of intact and non-intact forests
Mollicone, D., Achard, F., Federici, S., Eva, H. D., Grassi, G., Belward, A., Raes, F., Seufert, G., Stibig, H.-J., Matteucci, G., et al. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9231-2 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- TOWNSHEND, J. R. G., & JUSTICE, C. O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-236
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2079693950
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01431168808954847
- The paper
- TOWNSHEND, J. R. G., & JUSTICE, C. O. (1988). Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168808954847
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.