The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models
Abstract
Fraction of green vegetation, fg, and green leaf area index, Lg, are needed as a regular space-time gridded input to evapotranspiration schemes in the two National Weather Service (NWS) numerical prediction models regional Eta and global medium range forecast. This study explores the potential of deriving these two variables from the NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. Obviously, one NDVI measurement does not allow simultaneous derivation of both vegetation variables. Simple models of a satellite pixel are used to illustrate the ambiguity resulting from a combination of the unknown horizontal (fg) and vertical (Lg) densities. We argue that for NOAA AVHRR data sets based on observations with a spatial resolution of a few kilometres the most appropriate way to resolve this ambiguity is to assume that the vegetated part of a pixel is covered by dense vegetation (i.e., its leaf area index is high), and to calculate fg=(NDVI-NDVI0)/(NDVI8-NDVI0), where NDVIo (bare soil) and NDVI (dense vegetation) are specified as global constants independent of vegetation/soil type. Global (0.15o)2 spatial resolution monthly maps of fg were produced from a 5-year NDVI climatology and incorporated in the NWS models. As a result, the model surface fluxes were improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: A case study of Shanghai, China
Li, J., Song, C., Cao, L., Zhu, F., Meng, X., & Wu, J. (2011) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008 · Cited by 1,120
A land data assimilation system for sub-Saharan Africa food and water security applications
McNally, A., Arsenault, K., Kumar, S., Shukla, S., Peterson, P., Wang, S., Funk, C., Peters-Lidard, C. D., & Verdin, J. P. (2017) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.12 · Cited by 632
Giri, C., Pengra, B., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., & Tieszen, L. L. (2007) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.12.019 · Cited by 527
Decomposition of vegetation cover into woody and herbaceous components using AVHRR NDVI time series
Lu, H. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00054-3 · Cited by 286
Parameterization of cold‐season processes in the MAPS land‐surface scheme
Smirnova, T. G., Brown, J. M., Benjamin, S. G., & Kim, D. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901047 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutman, G., & Ignatov, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1533-1543
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2155096269
- Cited by
- 1,273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014311698215333
- The paper
- Gutman, G., & Ignatov, A. (1998). The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.