The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neural network for emulation of an inverse model operational derivation of Case II water properties from MERIS data
Abstract
An algorithm was developed to derive the concentrations of phytoplankton pigment, suspended matter and gelbstoff, and the aerosol path radiance from 'Rayleigh corrected' top-of-atmosphere reflectances over turbid coastal waters. The procedure is designed for MERIS, the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer, which will be flown onboard the Earth observation satellite Envisat of the European Space Agency (ESA). The algorithm is a neural network (NN) which is used to parameterize the inverse of a radiative transfer model. It is used in this study as a multiple nonlinear regression technique. The NN is a feedforward backpropagation model with two hidden layers. The NN was trained with computed reflectances covering the range of 0.5-50mugl-1 phytoplankton pigment, 1-100mgl-1 suspended matter, gelbstoff absorption at 420nm of 0.02-2m-1 and a horizontal visibility of 2-50km. Inputs to the NN are the reflectances of the 16 spectral channels which were under discussion for MERIS. The outputs are the three water constituent concentrations and the aerosol concentration, here expressed as the horizontal ground visibility. Tests with simulated reflectances show: (1) that concentations are correctly retrieved for a wide range covering oligotrophic Case I and turbid Case II water; (2) that the atmospheric correction can be performed even over very turbid water where the reflectance of the water cannot be neglected for the atmospheric correction channels in the near-infrared spectral range; and (3) that the algorithm is robust against errors in the input data. Although the training of the NN is time consuming, the utilization of the NN algorithm is extremely fast and can be applied routinely for satellite data mass production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning
Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R., & Rosen, M. S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25988 · Cited by 1,694
The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data
Mas, J. F., & Flores, J. J. (2008) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160701352154 · Cited by 616
The MERIS Case 2 water algorithm
Doerffer, R., & Schiller, H. (2007) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600821127 · Cited by 549
Self-citationSensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing
Emberton, S., Chittka, L., Cavallaro, A., & Wang, M. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8010001 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiller, H., & Doerffer, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1735-1746
- ISSN
- 0143-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5901
- OpenAlex
- W2035623332
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural network for emulation of an inverse model operational derivation of Case II water properties from MERIS data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014311699212443
- The paper
- Schiller, H., & Doerffer, R. (1999). Neural network for emulation of an inverse model operational derivation of Case II water properties from MERIS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699212443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.